← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Evropi Toulkeridou, Jiafei Li, Leonardo Lari, Panagiotis Grammatikopoulos

The evolution of AI from image interpretation toward scientific inference in nanoparticle electron microscopy

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 10388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming electron microscopy by enabling quantitative analysis of increasingly large and complex datasets for nanoparticle characterization.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Jun 9

Context-Aware Deep Learning for Defect Classification in Atomic-Resolution STEM

arXiv:2606. 09419v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing materials characterization, yet most applications in electron microscopy rely solely on image contrast, overlooking the chemical and experimental context that shapes image formation.

By Jiadong Dan, Cheng Zhang, Leyi Loh, Ivan Verzhbitskiy, Yuan Chen, Goki Eda, Michel Bosman, N. Duane Loh
agentsmultimodal
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

Mapping Order in Semicrystalline Polymers using Machine Learning of Nanobeam Electron Diffraction

arXiv:2607. 16570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Organic mixed ionic electronic conductors (OMIECs) are a promising class of polymer materials for applications spanning neuromorphic computation to energy efficient electronics and bioelectronics.

By Nicholas Marchese, Arthur R. C. McCray, Yael Tsarfati, Karen Bustillo, Adam Marks, Alberto Salleo, Colin Ophus
More like this →
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 23

Real-Time Atomic-Resolution Electron Phase Imaging without Probe Calibration via Ptychography-Supervised Learning

The paper introduces a ptychography‑supervised learning framework that transforms 4D‑STEM data into real‑time atomic‑resolution phase images. By training a compact model on physics‑constrained reference phase maps from a single AuPd dataset, the method predicts local phase patches directly from diffraction patterns without probe calibration or iterative optimization. The resulting workflow achieves an online latency of ~0.27 ms per probe position, a 1,000‑fold speed‑up over GPU‑accelerated ePIE, and maintains atomic‑scale lattice contrast while generalizing across materials, defocus conditions, and instruments.

By H. Yue, C. -C. Chen, C. -N. Hsiao, J. Cheng, Y. Liu, X. Z. Liao, Steve F. Shu
fine-tuningefficiency
More like this →