arXiv AI By Lauri Lov\'en, Sasu Tarkoma

The Endogeneity of Miscalibration: Impossibility and Escape in Scored Reporting

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper examines how an agent’s probability report is evaluated twice—once by a strictly proper scoring rule and again by an approval rule that determines a decision. It shows that when the approval rule is welfare‑maximizing, it cannot be affine, yet the resulting distortion is predictable and can be mitigated by a reserve report that neutralizes the cost of pretending to be the marginal type. A Lipschitz rule with a single kink achieves first‑best welfare, while smooth rules cannot, and the key constraint is the steepness of the rule rather than its smoothness.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Delegating Authorization to Misaligned Agents: Coalitional Alignment and Safe Control

The paper studies how to safely delegate action approval to multiple AI reviewers when the reviewers themselves may be misaligned. It introduces a weaker condition—k‑robust coalitional alignment—under which a threshold rule that tolerates up to k disapprovals guarantees that the principal’s expected utility is at least as good as a baseline policy. The authors extend this characterization to sequential decision‑making in discounted MDPs and show that full‑panel coverage of reward functions ensures safety in Nash equilibria, while more permissive thresholds can lead to unsafe outcomes. Experiments demonstrate that collective review can remain sound even when individual reviewers are not fully aligned, provided some disapprovals are allowed.

By Natalie Collina, Surbhi Goel, Aaron Roth, Sikata Bela Sengupta
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

The Behavioral Credibility Trilemma: When Calibrated Autonomy Becomes Impossible

arXiv:2605. 25739v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We prove that no reinforcement learning policy with confidence-gated autonomy can simultaneously achieve maximum helpfulness, optimal calibration, and full autonomy under rational oversight, whenever some tasks exceed the agent's reliable competence: the Behavioral Credibility Trilemma.

By Lauri Lov\'en, Nam Do, Hassan Mehmood, Dinesh Kumar Sah, Sasu Tarkoma
arXiv AI
Sep 25

ERRAND: Budgeted Maintenance of Agent Memory

ERRAND is a new method for budgeted maintenance of agent memory that treats revalidation of stored knowledge as a priced errand competing for scarce actions. It uses an errand index that is single‑peaked, allowing certainty in either direction to cost nothing, and repairs by writing new versions rather than deleting old ones. In experiments across two drifting tool‑use worlds, ERRAND outperforms non‑oracle policies, achieving up to 10.0 percentage points improvement over eager revalidation while using only 11.0% of steps, and it self‑terminates when no budget is imposed.

By Beining Wu, Zihao Ding, Jun Huang