arXiv Computation and Language By Verena Platzgummer, John McCrae, Sina Ahmadi

\textit{Versteasch du mi?} Computational and Socio-Linguistic Perspectives on GenAI, LLMs, and Non-Standard Language

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper examines how Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI (GenAI) are biased against less-spoken languages and deepen the digital language divide. Drawing on critical sociolinguistics and computational linguistics, it investigates the intersections of technology, language policy, and linguistic variation using South Tyrolean dialects and Kurdish varieties as case studies. The authors explore technical solutions for handling non‑standard language and assess whether such approaches can support democratic and decolonial digital strategies with policy implications.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Jul 10

How Do I Know What to Say Next? Barenholtz's Autogenerative Theory as an Enrichment of Harrisean Integrationism

arXiv:2607. 07891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Roy Harris's Integrationist linguistics offers a compelling critique of the referentialist tradition embedded deep at the heart of computational approaches to language, arguing that language is not a code that maps onto a pre-given world but a situated, bipartite activity oriented toward prospective joint action.

By J. Mark Bishop, Stephen J. Cowley
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Incorporating Machine-Others: An Enactive Exploration of Human-LLM Interactions

The paper argues that new interactional concepts are needed to understand how humans change when engaging with large language models (LLMs). Drawing on enactive theory and the notion of Linguistic Bodies, it proposes that humans incorporate LLMs both as tools that enable specific skills and as linguistic partners that shape identity and language use. The authors introduce the idea of "susceptive sense‑making" to describe the heightened semiotic labor involved when friction is absent in these interactions, and suggest that this dynamic may affect users’ autonomy and development.

By Elena C. Cuffari, Marta P\'erez-Verdugo, Xabier E. Barandiaran
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

Artificial intelligence is creating a new global linguistic hierarchy

The paper analyzes the distribution of artificial intelligence resources across 6,003 languages, revealing that a small number of languages dominate and that disparities are widening exponentially. It compares the diffusion of AI with earlier information technologies, noting a hype-driven spread pattern. The authors introduce the Language AI Readiness Index (EQUATE) to map technological, socio-economic, and infrastructural prerequisites for AI deployment, aiming to guide equitable diffusion of language AI.

By Giulia Occhini, Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii, Anna Barford, Refael Tikochinski, Songbo Hu, Roi Reichart, Yijie Zhou, ester James V. Miranda, Hannah Claus, Ulla Petti, Ivan Vuli\'c, Ramit Debnath, Anna Korhonen
arXiv AI
Jul 8

Rethinking Indic AI from a Lens of Cultural Heritage Preservation

arXiv:2607. 06544v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) makes inroads into different parts of the Indian subcontinent, there is significant interest in studying how AI impacts the linguistic and cultural foundations of this civilization.

By Aparna Madva, Sharath Srivatsa, Srinath Srinivasa, Tulika Saha