The paper investigates whether language models can transfer hierarchical syntactic knowledge from a source language (L1) to a target language (L2) using a novel cross‑lingual poverty‑of‑stimulus (CPOS) experimental design. Results show that models can partially transfer L1 structural evidence to L2, producing a small but detectable hierarchical bias that varies across language pairs. The study further demonstrates that vocabulary overlap is crucial for successful transfer, indicating that cross‑lingual learning of hierarchical generalization is conditionally achievable.
By Shin Yamaguchi, Masaya Taniguchi, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Taro Watanabe, Yoshinobu Kano
Large language models show strong cross‑lingual abilities, but previous studies have examined them only at isolated training points. This work pretrains a 1.7B multilingual model on nine languages, recording checkpoints at fine granularity to track translation development. Using word‑level translation and a new dataset, the authors find that early learning is dominated by token‑level copying and surface similarities, while later stages involve more general translation mechanisms and refined copying.
By Felicia K\"orner, Maria Matveev, Florian Eichin, Gitta Kutyniok, Barbara Plank, Michael A. Hedderich
The study evaluates synthetic pre‑pretraining (PPT) across a wide range of models (500 M–7 B parameters) and training budgets (up to 100 B tokens). Results show that PPT consistently improves downstream performance and token efficiency, saving at least 21 B tokens at the 3 B scale, but these gains do not appear to stem from a grammatical prior. Instead, PPT benefits arise from tasks that enhance long‑range retrieval, and the improvements remain robust across diverse data mixtures, diminishing only when web text is omitted.
By Atsuki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Inaba, Joel Niklaus, Michal \v{S}tef\'anik, Aline Villavicencio, Nikolaos Aletras
The paper investigates cross‑lingual transfer for sequential sentence classification (SSC) in research papers, focusing on 13 non‑English languages. Experiments show that linguistic proximity does not reliably predict transfer success, whereas structural similarity in rhetorical organization—particularly label distribution similarity—correlates positively with performance. The authors introduce three generative‑model methods that exploit structural cues, achieving parity with strong encoder baselines on‑domain and outperforming them when transferring to unseen languages.
By Kazuhiro Yamauchi, Marie Katsurai
arXiv:2610.07168v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Representations of translated sentences are similar in the inner layers of multilingual language models -- an observation connected to the platonic rep...
By Darshil Doshi, Wenjie Zhou, Corinna Elena Wegner, Daniel J. Korchinski, Santiago Acevedo, Matthieu Wyart
arXiv:2606.23566v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Language-specific tokenizers improve tokenization quality and the downstream performance of models on those languages. Using one with an existing p...
By Clara Meister, Suchir Salhan, Andrzej Szablewski, Pietro Lesci, Paula Buttery, Tiago Pimentel