arXiv:2606. 26117v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper introduces the Governance Inversion Hypothesis (GIH) to explain a growing paradox in artificial intelligence (AI) governance: under conditions of increasing regulatory expansion and technological complexity, organisations may become more formally governed while simultaneously experiencing a decline in operational control over AI systems.
By Victor Frimpong
arXiv:2607. 13040v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper examines where final authority should sit once capable AI systems are embedded in organizational workflows.
By Zexun Wang
arXiv:2608. 10153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprises are deploying autonomous AI agents faster than they can govern them, and prevailing approaches stretch a single discipline, typically DevSecOps built for deterministic automation, across every scale of agency.
By Srinivas Telukunta, Georgios Nektarios Lilis, Lucio Baron
arXiv:2606. 16649v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI marks a new phase of enterprise automation.
By Christopner Koch, Joshua A. Wellbrock
arXiv:2606. 24224v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite the extensive discussions of human-centric AI (HCAI) in Industry 5.
By Zhen-Yuan Ralph Liu (CUMT), Yu-Ting Wang (NFU), Jia-Jia Yan (NEOMA), Shivam Gupta (NEOMA), Mihalis Giannakis
arXiv:2608. 12352v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI governance frameworks can be known, used, and implemented in form without becoming governance in practice.
By Joseph R. Simons, David A. Broniatowski