arXiv AI
Jul 7
CAGE-1: Control, Assurance, and Governance Evaluation for Enterprise Agentic AI
arXiv:2607. 03510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprise artificial intelligence is moving from experimentation into operational workflows.
The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI
arXiv:2608. 10153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprises are deploying autonomous AI agents faster than they can govern them, and prevailing approaches stretch a single discipline, typically DevSecOps built for deterministic automation, across every scale of agency.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 7
AGL-1: The Enterprise AI Governance Layer as a Control Plane for Trusted Enterprise Intelligence
arXiv:2607. 03516v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprise artificial intelligence is moving from isolated experimentation toward operational dependency across copilots, retrieval-augmented generation systems, autonomous agents, and AI-enabled business workflows.
arXiv AI
Sep 15
The Agentic Company OS: Substrate Inversion for Sustained Enterprise Agent Deployment
arXiv:2609.13334v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprise AI agents often succeed in a demonstration and then stall once they must operate day after day. An industry report estimates that most pil...
arXiv AI
Jun 17
Large Language Models for Agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, Evaluation, and Safety
arXiv:2605. 12729v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly being used to support network operations (NetOps) and artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps), including incident investigation, root-cause analysis, configuration synthesis, and limited self-healing.
arXiv AI
Jun 11
A Five-Plane Reference Architecture for Runtime Governance of Production AI Agents
arXiv:2606. 12320v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise security was built to govern data boundaries: the protected surface was data at rest and in transit, and the controls -- access control, data-loss prevention, perimeter inspection -- governed crossings of that boundary.
arXiv AI
Jul 24
pAI-Econ-claude: A Gated Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Architecture for AI-Assisted Economic Theory Development
arXiv:2607. 21268v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In many social-science research tasks, such as economics, LLM-based agents must produce outputs for which no cheap, task-complete, machine-readable correctness signal exists.
arXiv AI
Aug 28
Risks and Controls for Multi-Agent Systems: an analytical framework for deployment of AI agents across organisational boundaries
The report introduces an analytical framework for assessing risks that arise when AI agents interact, especially as those interactions cross organisational boundaries. It defines three deployment tiers—singular governance, federated governance, and open environments—each with distinct governance requirements. For each tier, the report examines risk factors, failure modes, and controls, identifying who can apply them and highlighting gaps that require collective action.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 1
Risk Architecture for AI-Native Engineering Teams: An Organizational Framework for Agentic System Governance
Engineering management research has produced mature frameworks for software risk: ownership by feature, escalation by severity, and assurance by test coverage. These frameworks implicitly assume deterministic behavior, discrete and auditable change events, and clear component-to-owner mappings.
arXiv AI
Sep 15
Governing at Machine Speed: An Adaptive Intelligence Architecture for Real-Time AI Policy Enforcement
The paper "Governing at Machine Speed: An Adaptive Intelligence Architecture for Real-Time AI Policy Enforcement" highlights a gap in enterprise AI governance, where 78% of organizations lack auditable evidence of policy enforcement. It introduces AGIL, a five-layer adaptive governance architecture that uses machine learning for real-time detection, risk classification, sub-100ms policy enforcement, continuous attestation, and policy evolution. The authors argue that the failure is organizational and architectural, not technical, and call for future empirical validation of AGIL.
arXiv AI
Jun 8
The Three-Ring Architecture: Governing Agents in the Era of On-Platform Organisations
arXiv:2606. 07119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The current phase of enterprise AI deployment faces a structural failure: organisations are acquiring agentic capability without the infrastructure to govern it.
arXiv AI
Sep 1
Operationalising AI Regulatory Sandboxes: Activities, Requirements, and Technical Assessment under the EU AI Act
The paper "Operationalising AI Regulatory Sandboxes: Activities, Requirements, and Technical Assessment under the EU AI Act" outlines a detailed framework for implementing AI Regulatory Sandboxes (AIRS) under the EU AI Act. It maps the sandbox lifecycle into 29 activities, distinguishes between a Core AIRS and an Extended AIRS that includes an AI Technical Sandbox (AITS), and derives 15 infrastructural and governance requirements linked to these activities and provider obligations. The authors also introduce the Sandbox Configurator, an open‑source tool to instantiate AITS environments, aiming to provide structured workflows for regulators, robust evaluation methods for experts, and a transparent compliance pathway for AI providers.
arXiv AI
Jul 16
Final Authority in AI Governance: Frontier-Provider Sovereignty and Action-Centered Deployer Governance
arXiv:2607. 13040v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper examines where final authority should sit once capable AI systems are embedded in organizational workflows.