arXiv:2508. 09883v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities in tasks such as algorithmic coding and mathematical problem-solving.
By Xiaojun Wu, Xiaoguang Jiang, Huiyang Li, Jucai Zhai, Dengfeng Liu, Qiaobo Hao, Huang Liu, Zhiguo Yang, Ji Xie, Ninglun Gu, Jin Yang, Kailai Zhang, Yelun Bao, Jun Wang
arXiv:2607. 22629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) produce long, explicit chains of intermediate steps before generating a final answer at inference time.
By Durgesh Kalwar, Vardhan Palod, Subbarao Kambhampati
arXiv:2607. 04572v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) tutors often produce fluent step-by-step explanations, but a correct and pedagogically formatted response does not guarantee that the answer was derived from the student-facing problem.
By Bonan Shen, Dingyan Shang, Youting Wang, Tao Ning
arXiv:2609.37044v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Explicit intermediate reasoning gives large language models (LLMs) a stronger problem-solving mode. We study learning from this think-mode advantage vi...
By Wanqi Ren, Jianxiang Wang, Danxuan Liu, Linyi Ding, Yuan Zhang
arXiv:2608.29623v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Recent advances in large reasoning models (LRMs) have shown strong performance on complex problems through long chain-of-thought (Long CoT) reasoning...
By Yangsong Lan, Renkai Hu, HongKai Zheng, Bo Zhang, Renzhi Wang, Hongliang Dai, Piji Li
CoTranslator is a method that converts reverse chain-of-thought (CoT) responses into verified forward CoT responses, enabling efficient large-scale generation and verification of training data for reasoning distillation. Trained on a small set of paired reverse and rejection-sampled forward responses, it improves student model accuracy on mathematics benchmarks by up to 5.82 percentage points and retains 95.0% of rejection sampling’s accuracy while using only 35.9% of its compute. The translator also transfers to new datasets, teachers, and STEM problems, boosting average STEM accuracy for 4B and 8B students by 4.88 and 4.31 percentage points, respectively.
By Zinan Tang, Zhuoshi Pan, Kairui Chen, Ze Yan, Shaomian Zheng, Yukun Zhang, Gang Wang, Biqing Huang