Agent harnesses require a low-latency guardrail model together with customizable audit policies. However, deploying an auto-regressive guardrail model remains challenging: such models incur high infer...
arXiv:2609.14987v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents interact with external environments through tool invocation, but tool outputs can also expose them to indirect prom...
By Bingzheng Wang, Xiaoyan Gu, Wentao Wang, Xingyou Yang, Hongcheng Li, Rong Yin
arXiv:2609.35807v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLM agents can make unsafe tool calls even when instructed to behave safely. Existing defenses constrain agents before execution, modify tool inputs/...
By Charlie Summers, Prajwal Raghunath, Aaditya Pai, Mayur Kulkarni, Zhuo Zhang, Oliver Kennedy, Eugene Wu
arXiv:2609.00015v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: AI agents powered by large language models are evolving from isolated assistants into heterogeneous systems in which multiple agents, planners, control...
By Dongsheng Chen, Xiangyu Zhao, Xin Yao, Xuetao Wei
arXiv:2609.22724v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Mobile agents powered by foundation models now automate complex, multi-step workflows on real devices, but their trajectories can violate app-specifi...
By Changyue Jiang, Jiayi Wang, Xin Wen, Jiarun Dai, Geng Hong, Xudong Pan
Guard models are used to prevent LLM agents from performing forbidden actions, but this alone does not guarantee safety. The paper shows that many agent trajectories contain unfulfilled safety‑critical obligations—actions that should have been performed—highlighting a new source of risk. To address this, the authors introduce ObligationBench, a benchmark of 240 expert‑validated trajectories, and develop ObligationGuard, a model that improves obligation detection recall and exact‑match rates over existing models.
By Youwei Feng, Yitong Zhang, Yuetong Liu, Jia Li