arXiv AI By Fabian Broszio, Michael Hoffmann, Adrian Paschke

Self-Reflective Chain-of-Thought (SRCoT): Evidence-Based Text Generation via a Closed-Loop Retrieve--Reflect--Revise Pipeline on Edge LLMs

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Self-Reflective Chain-of-Thought (SRCoT) is a modular architecture that structures text generation as a closed Retrieve–Reflect–Revise loop, separating environment state, persistent knowledge, accumulated experience, and short-term memory into provenance-labeled stores. BM25 retrieval supplies local context, while subsequent passes expose intermediate drafts, missing-information markers, follow-up queries, and optional claim–evidence mappings to inform retrieval, revision, clarification, or abstention decisions. The authors demonstrate the approach in synthetic emergency medical and simulation scenarios, showing source-labeled documentation, explicit gap marking, and structured dispatch-style outputs, while also noting provenance-assignment errors, incomplete evidence coverage, and unsafe assumptions that persist despite prompting constraints.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

Making every stage of medical device document assessment with large language models deterministic

The paper demonstrates that large language models (LLMs) used to preliminarily assess medical device documentation can produce inconsistent results across different commercial deployments and settings. By constructing a fully deterministic pipeline—including OCR, chunking, embedding, indexing, retrieval, and inference—the authors achieved byte‑identical outputs across repeated runs, varied machines, and even interruptions. The study shows that end‑to‑end determinism is possible and provides a verifiable foundation for audit and change control in regulatory compliance.

By Ryosuke Suzuki
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

MemoryLACE: Memory Lifecycle-Aware Consolidation and Evidence Retrieval

MemoryLACE (MemLACE) is a lightweight memory framework that explicitly models the lifecycle of textual evidence—capturing sparse merge, supersession, and contradiction relations—while preserving atomic natural‑language memories and their provenance. Unlike traditional systems that retrieve memories independently, MemLACE reconstructs relation‑aware evidence units that expose current, historical, supporting, and conflicting evidence for downstream reasoning. In benchmark evaluations (BEAM and StructMemEval) using both open‑weight and proprietary LLM backbones, MemLACE achieves the highest overall performance among same‑backbone comparisons and reduces BEAM runtime by 66.6% compared to the strongest reflective‑memory baseline, Hindsight.

By Meriem Yacoubi, Pia Schmidt, Nenad Petrovic, Ahmed Frikha, Martin Kirchhoff, Alois Knoll