arXiv AI
Jun 8
Insights Generator: Systematic Corpus-Level Trace Diagnostics for LLM Agents
arXiv:2605. 21347v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diagnosing failures in LLM agents remains largely manual.
Transect: Retaining Observability for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Evaluations
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 19
AdaLens: Interactive Storyline for Monitoring and Steering Long-Running Agentic Data Analysis
AdaLens is an interactive system designed to monitor and steer long-running, autonomous data analysis workflows powered by large language models. It provides a storyline-based interface that unifies analytical plans, execution progress, intermediate findings, and data-column involvement, enabling analysts to observe evolving reasoning and evidence. The system also offers steering interactions that allow users to redirect low-value directions or deepen promising ones during execution.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting
arXiv:2606. 09809v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI evaluation results are produced at scale but reported inconsistently across leaderboards, model cards, benchmark papers, and company blogs.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11
Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 11: Agent-Based Experiment Reproduction from Scientific Papers
The article introduces AgentActionBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate agent-based experiment reproduction across machine learning and AI4Science papers. It employs an MCP-based Action Recorder to capture agents’ behavior during reproduction and assesses the resulting traces against paper-specific rubrics. The benchmark includes 150 papers, with a human-annotated subset and model-assisted augmentation expanding it to over 10,000 rubric items, revealing that current systems face execution bottlenecks but that model-generated rubrics correlate strongly with human judgments.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents
arXiv:2603. 14465v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into tool-using agents, they remain brittle in long-horizon interactions.
arXiv AI
Aug 11
$A^2E$ : An End-to-End Agent Auditing Engine
arXiv:2608. 07346v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), harnesses have become essential infrastructure for deploying agents across a wide range of domains.
arXiv AI
Aug 10
An End-to-End Agent Auditing Engine
arXiv:2608. 07346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), harnesses have become essential infrastructure for deploying agents across a wide range of domains.
arXiv AI
Aug 7
Autonomous Research Agents: A Survey of AI Scientists and the Verification Gap
arXiv:2608. 05179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used across the scientific research lifecycle: ideation, literature search, experiment design and execution, analysis, manuscript drafting, and review.
arXiv AI
Sep 7
RefactorPlatform: An Open-Source Harness for Controlled Evaluation of Repository-Scale Refactoring Agents
RefactorPlatform is an open‑source harness that standardizes the evaluation of repository‑scale refactoring agents by fixing the environment and systematically varying design choices such as model backbone, execution regime, and prompt specificity. Each run operates in an isolated workspace, logs detailed telemetry, and verifies changes with AST‑based checks. Experiments on 100 RefactorBench tasks show that AST‑aware chunking improves performance by 25‑30%, a lean retrieval‑augmented single agent outperforms a sub‑agent configuration, and retrieval’s accuracy gains offset its token overhead, keeping cost per successful refactoring unchanged.
arXiv AI
3d ago
Self-Supervised Scaling of Terminal Environments for Scientific Domains
The paper introduces a self‑supervised framework called software‑in‑the‑loop reconstruction (SWR) that automatically generates reference outputs and verification targets for terminal agents by leveraging existing scientific software workflows. SWR executes multiple input configurations, partitions cases into public observations and hidden evaluations, and uses a hierarchical verifier to assess agent‑generated programs against hidden workflow outputs. The authors demonstrate the approach on 500 workflows across six domains, achieving significant performance gains on the Terminal‑Bench 2 benchmark with the Qwen3.8‑Max and Qwen3.8‑27B models.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25
An Empirical Study of Automating Agent Evaluation
The paper presents EvalAgent, an AI assistant that automates agent evaluation by encoding domain expertise into evaluation skills such as procedural instructions, reusable code, and dynamic API retrieval. EvalAgent constructs a trace-based pipeline that outputs metrics, executable code, and reports, and is evaluated using a new meta-evaluation framework and AgentEvalBench. Results show that EvalAgent improves the Eval@1 metric from 17.5% to 65% and receives 79.5% human expert preference, while ablation studies confirm the importance of evaluation skills.
arXiv AI
Jul 8
Prompt-to-Paper: Agentic AI System for Bioinformatics
arXiv:2607. 05456v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While recent advances in large language models have enabled end-to-end automated manuscript generation, existing systems suffer from three critical deficiencies: (i) generated claims are not deterministically grounded in verifiable literature, (ii) experimental results are frequently fabricated rather than executed, and (iii) there exists no standardized, multi-dimensional framework to assess whether AI-generated manuscripts meet the quality and rigor required for real-world publication.