arXiv Computation and Language By Esteban Garc\'es Arias

Reference-Based Analysis of Coherence and Diversity in Open-Ended Text Generation

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces a reference-based framework to analyze coherence and diversity in open-ended text generation. It evaluates these properties by aligning them with human trajectories, comparing them to human continuations, and estimating their likelihood under a human reference distribution. Experiments show that diversity alignment and mean-based comparisons correlate with human quality ratings, while reference likelihood also associates positively, though results vary by configuration.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Jun 9

Summarization is Not Dead Yet

arXiv:2606. 08000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The progress of large language models (LLMs) has fueled claims that model-generated summaries rival or even surpass human-written references, raising questions about whether summarization remains an open research problem.

By Dongqi Liu, Chenxi Whitehouse, Zheng Zhao, Zhuchen Cao, Jian Li, Yabiao Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

A Semiotics-Aware Framework for Evaluating Fidelity and Coverage in Natural Language Generation

The paper introduces a semiotics-aware framework for assessing natural language generation, focusing on how well two texts align in terms of contextual meaning and discourse references. It defines two metrics—Semiotic Fidelity and Semiotic Coverage—to quantify how much of one text’s semiotic profile is supported by the other and how much of the other’s profile is recovered. Experiments reveal that coverage is usually lower than fidelity, and that language models align best with human-curated data at low sampling temperatures, with higher temperatures diminishing this alignment.

By Lorenzo Zangari, Davide Picca