arXiv:2606. 08000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The progress of large language models (LLMs) has fueled claims that model-generated summaries rival or even surpass human-written references, raising questions about whether summarization remains an open research problem.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 03655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Abstractive summarization models remain vulnerable to factual inconsistency, redundancy, and weak length control.
arXiv:2606. 17350v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled the generation of high-quality prose, yet the question of whether these models are capable of generating diverse outputs remains contested.
arXiv:2607. 21010v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Zero-shot summarization using Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced the abstractive summarization task by producing coherent and fluent summaries.
Scientific long-document summarization datasets commonly treat author-written abstracts as gold reference summaries, although their quality and alignment with the source article vary. At the same time, publicly available scientific summarization datasets remain limited in scale and structure for modern long-context models.
arXiv:2607. 10806v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantifying abstractiveness in generated summaries is essential for evaluating summarization models beyond surface-level metrics like ROUGE.
arXiv:2607. 18983v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present AutoJourn, a demonstration system for multi-perspective news generation and bias-aware evaluation using large language models (LLMs).