PruneShift: A Framework for Evaluating Decision Reliability in Structured Pruning
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2608.23744v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Split conformal prediction, not the pruning rule, supplies finite-sample marginal coverage once a pruned model is fixed independently of the conformal...
arXiv:2608. 01378v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Design campaigns in chemistry, materials science, and machine learning share a bottleneck: determining how good a candidate truly is requires an expensive evaluation - an experiment, a first-principles simulation, or a full training run.
arXiv:2607. 01444v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models offer inference speedups via selective activation but impose substantial memory requirements because the whole network must remain loaded.
arXiv:2607. 25136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on preference optimization often varies the training objective while holding the data fixed.
arXiv:2608. 02940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A reproducible compression statistic can still select the wrong candidate.
arXiv:2606. 03328v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Calibration data are often treated as a minor implementation detail in post-training LLM pruning because averaged evaluations suggest only modest effects.