arXiv Computation and Language By David Porte\v{s}, Ale\v{s} Hor\'ak

Prosody-to-Text: Predicting text from low-pass filtered speech

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper explores the reverse of the common prosody-from-text task by predicting text from low‑frequency speech features. Using a Whisper model fine‑tuned on only the 12 lowest Mel bins (≈450 Hz cutoff), the authors achieve a word error rate of 36 %, with 10 % of utterances perfectly recovered and 40 % below 25 % WER. They also report that, given the correct prefix, the next token is predicted correctly 79 % of the time, indicating a stronger link between low‑frequency prosody and lexical content than previously assumed.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20

Hear2Act: Benchmarking When Prosody Should Change What an Assistant Does

Prosodic cues can convey task-relevant information that alters the trajectory and outcome of a task-oriented dialogue, even when the words themselves remain unchanged. Yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate prosodic perception, response appropriateness, and task-oriented dialogue in isolation, making it difficult to test whether prosodic evidence changes downstream decisions.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

Using Prosody to Predict Syntactic Structure

arXiv:2608.30260v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While it is well-established that prosody carries crucial cues for syntactic structure, the degree and nature of correspondence between these two dom...

By Junghyun Min, Alex Warstadt, Tamar I. Regev, Tiago Pimentel, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensions

arXiv:2608. 09930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Models (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive.

By Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Simon Rosen, Jash Shah, Lindsay Devon Brin, Hoang H Nguyen, Anke Koelzer, Rachel Hansen, Tara Bogavelli, Fanny Riols