arXiv Computation and Language

Reducing the Output-Mode Gap in Speech Language Models via Joint-Output On-Policy Distillation

arXiv AI
Jun 9

End-to-End Training for Discrete Token LLM based TTS System

arXiv:2606. 09234v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-speech (TTS) systems typically adopt a cascaded pipeline consisting of a speech tokenizer, an autoregressive large language model (LLM), and a diffusion based flow-matching (FM) model, with these components trained independently.

By Changfeng Gao, Yong Ren, Jun Yuan, Ye Bai, Zhao You, ShiDong Shang
arXiv AI
Jun 9

GenTSE: Enhancing Target Speaker Extraction via a Coarse-to-Fine Generative Language Model

arXiv:2512. 20978v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Language Model (LM)-based generative modeling has emerged as a promising direction for TSE, offering potential for improved generalization and high-fidelity speech.

By Haoyang Li, Xuyi Zhuang, Azmat Adnan, Ye Ni, Wei Rao, Shreyas Gopal, Eng Siong Chng, Boon Siew Han, Yuanjin Zheng
arXiv AI
Oct 12

AudioTETRIS: Token Elimination via Transitional Importance Signals for Efficient Audio LLMs

AudioTETRIS is a training‑free, two‑stage token elimination framework designed for large audio language models. It leverages the geometry of audio encoder representations as an acoustic prior to compute per‑token importance scores, which guide progressive top‑k token selection across decoder layers. Experiments on Qwen2‑Audio‑7B, Phi‑4‑Multimodal, and Audio Flamingo 3 show that AudioTETRIS retains near‑full performance while using only 25% of audio tokens and outperforms existing training‑free baselines.

By Shreya Sajid, Anna Vettoruzzo, Joaquin Vanschoren
arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

AzeroS: Extending LLM to Speech with Self-Generated Instruction-Free Tuning

The paper introduces AZeroS, a speech‑adapted large language model that uses Self‑Generated Instruction‑Free Tuning (SIFT) to avoid task‑specific instruction data. By training only two lightweight projection modules on 25,000 hours of speech‑text pairs and 3,000 hours of paralinguistic labels, AZeroS achieves state‑of‑the‑art results on semantic and paralinguistic benchmarks while keeping the core LLM and audio encoder frozen.

By Yiwen Shao, Wei Liu, Jiahong Li, Tianzi Wang, Kun Wei, Meng Yu, Dong Yu
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Do Spoken Language Models Hear Speech as They Read Text? Bridging Structural Gaps Between Speech and Text

The paper investigates how Spoken Language Models (SLMs) process speech compared to text, noting that current SLMs show weak alignment between speech and text representations despite strong downstream performance. The authors propose a framework that separates length mismatch from semantic alignment to better match speech and text representations. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that this approach yields competitive results against strong baselines, highlighting the need to explicitly address structural differences between speech and text in SLM training.

By Hyeonyu Kim, Hwayeon Kim, Youngwon Choi, Myeongkyun Cho, Huu-Kim Nguyen
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Speech Meets ELF: Audio Conditional Continuous-Target Diffusion for Speech Recognition and Translation

arXiv:2606. 10368v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech-to-text (S2T) systems for recognition (ASR) and translation (S2TT) typically generate discrete text tokens.

By Xuanchen Li, Tianrui Wang, Yuheng Lu, Zikang Huang, Yu Jiang, Chenghan Lin, Chenrui Cui, Ziyang Ma, Xingyu Ma, Chunyu Qiang, Guochen Yu, Xie Chen, Longbiao Wang, Jianwu Dang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 5

Learning When to Commit from Partial Speech for End-to-End Simultaneous Speech Translation

The paper presents a method for improving simultaneous speech translation by adapting a full‑utterance speech language model with prefix supervision derived from its own complete and partial waveform translations, eliminating the need for transcripts or human translations. Experiments on FLEURS and CoVoST2 across three language directions show that prefix training enhances quality–latency trade‑offs, especially when combined with multi‑turn append‑only decoding, and that a confidence threshold effectively controls the inference‑time quality–latency balance. The study also explores the impact of synthesis margin on translation quality and calibration, finding a non‑monotonic relationship with latency.

By Hieu Hoang, Amittai Axelrod
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

SPAR-K: Scheduled Periodic Alternating Early Exit for Spoken Language Models

SPAR-K is a scheduled periodic alternating early‑exit framework for interleaved spoken language models that reduces decoding depth for speech tokens while maintaining quality. It lets most speech positions exit at a fixed intermediate layer and inserts periodic full‑depth refresh steps to counter distribution shift. Experiments on Step‑Audio‑2‑mini and GLM‑4‑Voice show up to 11 % depth reduction with less than 0.82 % drop in question‑answering accuracy and negligible impact on MOS and WER.

By Hsiao-Ying Huang, Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi Lee
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Liberating LLM Capabilities in Full-Duplex Speech Models

arXiv:2606. 07547v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech-based large language models are typically constrained to spoken replies, which limits their user-facing outputs to what can be verbalized and suppresses text-native capabilities such as code generation, structured analysis, and multi-step reasoning in realtime interaction, for tasks that require persistent, structured, and inspectable intermediate outputs.

By Luoyuan Zhang, Bokai Xu, Junbo Cui, Weiyue Sun, Yingjing Xu, Hanyu Liu, Yuan Yao
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Heard but Not Heeded: Paralinguistic Information Encoding and Loss in Audio-Language Models

The paper investigates whether audio‑language models capture paralinguistic cues beyond spoken content. Using the Expresso dataset and four open‑source models, the authors trace how speaking style information is encoded in the late layers of the audio encoder but is degraded before reaching the final output. They find that some models are content‑driven while others are acoustic‑driven, revealing a gap between what is encoded and what is utilized in current audio‑language models.

By Bhuvan Koduru, Dareen Safar B Alharthi, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj