arXiv:2608. 01425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training LLM-based multi-agent systems with multi-agent reinforcement learning is rapidly gaining traction, and a parallel line of work argues that such systems should be judged by their behavior, not only their reward.
By Yi Mao, Andrew Perrault
arXiv:2601. 17454v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Centralized value learning underlies a broad class of multi-agent reinforcement learning methods, but its claimed advantage is typically evaluated in settings that confound coordination structure with function approximation and partial observability.
By Muhammad Ahmed Atif, Nehal Naeem Haji, Mohammad Shahid Shaikh, Muhammad Ebad Atif
arXiv:2608. 04663v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning often adds social terms to individual rewards, yet the scale of those terms is usually chosen by hand.
By Aaditya Mehta, Arya Shah
arXiv:2608. 04232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Biological systems must regulate competing needs under limited perceptual bandwidth, where sharpening one estimate costs the capacity to sharpen the others.
By St John Grimbly, Nicolas Kuske, Evert A. Boonstra, Bruce A. Bassett, Charel van Hoof, Rowan Hodson, Benjamin Rosman, Ryan Smith, Mark Solms, Jonathan P. Shock
arXiv:2608. 13787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents increasingly act on their users' behalf, handling tasks such as scheduling meetings, comparing offers, and haggling over prices.
By Wenyue Hua, Zachary Huang, Tyler Payne, Safoora Yousefi, Saleema Amershi, Asli Celikyilmaz
arXiv:2605. 08747v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Standard embodied evaluations do not independently score whether an agent correctly commits to task completion at episode closure, a capacity we call terminal commitment.
By Ying Chen, Lihuang Fang, Rui Jiang, Mingxu Wang, Zhifeng Gu, Lei Yi, Jie Chen