arXiv Machine Learning July 27, 2026 By Muhammad Ahmed Atif, Nehal Naeem Haji, Mohammad Shahid Shaikh, Muhammad Ebad Atif

Embodiment-Induced Coordination Regimes in Tabular Multi-Agent Q-Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2601. 17454v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Centralized value learning underlies a broad class of multi-agent reinforcement learning methods, but its claimed advantage is typically evaluated in settings that confound coordination structure with function approximation and partial observability.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI

Jul 7

Regime-Conditional Stabilisation of LLM-Augmented Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2607. 04470v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a natural interface for translating human objectives into reward signals for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), yet the training-time dynamics of this integration remain poorly understood.

By Faid Keddouri, Sohaib Houhou, Aissa Boulmerka, Nadir Farhi

llms agents reinforcement-learning

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 10

Beyond Success Rates: Trainability and Extractability for Offline GCRL

arXiv:2602. 05459v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Offline goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (GCRL) is typically benchmarked by the best tuned success rate of each method.

By Jan Malte T\"opperwien, Aditya Mohan, Marius Lindauer

reinforcement-learning robotics

arXiv AI

Jun 9

Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents

arXiv:2606. 08340v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, they must coordinate with others over long horizons in open-ended interactive tasks.

By Kale-ab Abebe Tessera, Andras Szecsenyi, Cameron Barker, Alexander Rutherford, Davide Paglieri, Aidan Scannell, Henry Gouk, Elliot J. Crowley, Tim Rockt\"aschel, Amos Storkey

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Aug 6

Interoceptive Attention as Dynamic Homeostatic Prioritization in a Foraging Agent

arXiv:2608. 04232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Biological systems must regulate competing needs under limited perceptual bandwidth, where sharpening one estimate costs the capacity to sharpen the others.

By St John Grimbly, Nicolas Kuske, Evert A. Boonstra, Bruce A. Bassett, Charel van Hoof, Rowan Hodson, Benjamin Rosman, Ryan Smith, Mark Solms, Jonathan P. Shock

agents

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 4

Training Small LLMs as Spatial Multi-Agent Policies

arXiv:2608. 01425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training LLM-based multi-agent systems with multi-agent reinforcement learning is rapidly gaining traction, and a parallel line of work argues that such systems should be judged by their behavior, not only their reward.

By Yi Mao, Andrew Perrault

llms agents reinforcement-learning fine-tuning

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 4

RoMeRL: Balancing Feedback Coverage and the Memory-Reward Trap in Self-Evolving Agent Memory via Reduced-Order Utility States

arXiv:2608. 02508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-based memory systems for self-evolving LLM agents face two tightly coupled challenges.

By Yi Yang, Zhennan Chen, Yihong Zhuang, Tiehan Fan, Yinan Chen, Jian Li, Jian Yang, Ying Tai

llms agents reinforcement-learning

Related stories

Regime-Conditional Stabilisation of LLM-Augmented Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Beyond Success Rates: Trainability and Extractability for Offline GCRL

Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents

Interoceptive Attention as Dynamic Homeostatic Prioritization in a Foraging Agent

Training Small LLMs as Spatial Multi-Agent Policies

RoMeRL: Balancing Feedback Coverage and the Memory-Reward Trap in Self-Evolving Agent Memory via Reduced-Order Utility States