arXiv Machine Learning
Emergent aggregation from collective foraging
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 15
Unveiling Complex Collective Behaviors from Simple Rewards
arXiv:2607. 12861v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) holds great potential for robot swarms, but the black-box nature of neural policies complicates strategic analysis, limiting multi-robot applications.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14
Unveiling Complex Collective Behaviors from Simple Rewards
Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) holds great potential for robot swarms, but the black-box nature of neural policies complicates strategic analysis, limiting multi-robot applications. Furthermore, complex swarm behaviors can surprisingly emerge from simple rewards without explicit aggregation incentives.
arXiv Machine Learning
3d ago
Self-organizing reinforcement learning: a learner-free swarm approaches the explore-exploit optimum
The paper demonstrates that a minimal foraging swarm can approach the explore/exploit optimum of reinforcement learning without any learner or reward signal. Agents use heavy‑tailed Levy flights to explore, recruit neighbors via a threshold cascade on their proximity network, and disperse as patch crowds, creating a cycle that balances exploration and exploitation. The swarm attains the shape of the ideal‑free distribution (committed foragers track richness with slope 0.94) and reaches this allocation dynamically in about 150 steps, though it remains slightly exploitable and does not achieve the exact equilibrium.
arXiv Statistics ML
Aug 21
Emergence of cooperation: A reputation-modulated reinforcement learning
arXiv:2608. 20016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reputation is widely recognized as a key mechanism for sustaining cooperation.
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9
Spatial Pattern Formation from Multi-Agent Learning in Public Goods Dilemmas
The study investigates how spatial patterns arise when agents in public goods dilemmas learn movement strategies via tabular Q‑learning. Cooperators tend to cluster around resource peaks, while co‑adaptation with defectors can alter cluster strength and motion, sometimes producing traveling bands. Higher cooperator learning rates combined with lower defector rates lead to the greatest welfare losses, and crowding penalties can mitigate these losses, linking learning rates to spatial organization and collective welfare.
arXiv AI
Sep 15
Multi-Agent Empowerment and Emergence of Complex Behavior in Groups
arXiv:2604.21155v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Intrinsic motivations are receiving increasing attention, i.e. behavioral incentives that are not engineered, but emerge from the interaction of an...