arXiv:2607. 21721v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Where truths are scarce (e.
By Ali Siahkoohi, Sina Alemohammad
arXiv:2606. 02309v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative models are increasingly used as priors for inverse problems, but their ability to produce realistic images creates a basic trust problem: a plausible reconstruction may be supported by the measurements, or it may be filled in by the prior along unobserved directions.
By Pengfei Jin, Na Li, Quanzheng Li
arXiv:2601. 22443v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Can a diffusion model trained on bedrooms recover human faces?
By Jing Jia, Wei Yuan, Sifan Liu, Liyue Shen, Guanyang Wang
The paper introduces a new approach to source distribution estimation (SDE) in simulation-based science, addressing limitations of existing methods that rely on a fixed surrogate likelihood. By employing an expectation‑maximization framework, the authors iteratively train an amortized posterior on fresh simulations (E‑step) and refit the source distribution to the posterior’s average (M‑step). Two parameterizations are explored: separate source and posterior flows, and a single shared conditional flow, with experiments on three benchmark tasks showing improved performance over fixed surrogate and iterated baseline methods, notably achieving higher data‑space C2ST scores on the Lotka–Volterra benchmark.
By Trung-Dung Hoang, Lisa M. Koch
arXiv:2606. 17048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion and flow-based models learn powerful data priors by training a denoiser to reverse Gaussian corruption.
By Abbas Mammadov, Ozgur Kara, Kaan Oktay, Iskander Azangulov, Adil Kaan Akan, Hyungjin Chung, James Matthew Rehg, Yee Whye Teh
arXiv:2606. 30230v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Learned reconstruction operators for inverse problems are typically trained under a fixed noise model, and generalize poorly when the distribution during testing differs from the one assumed during training.
By Floor van Maarschalkerwaart, Subhadip Mukherjee, Christoph Brune, Marcello Carioni