arXiv Computer Vision By Jannatul Masruk Mukta, Rifa Sanjida, Adrita Rahman Tory, Md. Saifur Rahman, Khondokar Fida Hasan

Preprocessing Failure and Adversarial Detection in Depthwise-Separable Edge Vision Systems

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The paper evaluates six preprocessing defenses against adversarial attacks on depthwise‑separable CNNs, the dominant architecture in edge vision systems, and finds that these defenses consistently fail to recover clean predictions for such models, whereas a residual architecture shows partial recovery. The study reveals that the same preprocessing steps that break clean predictions leave adversarial predictions largely intact, creating a measurable asymmetry that can be exploited for detection without retraining or architectural changes. It also demonstrates that common image quality metrics do not reliably indicate defense effectiveness, highlighting a methodological gap in current evaluation practices.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 3

Preprocessing Failure and Adversarial Detection in Depthwise-Separable Edge Vision Systems

The paper examines how preprocessing defenses, commonly used to protect edge vision systems, perform on depthwise‑separable CNNs versus residual architectures. Six preprocessing methods were tested against adversarial attacks, revealing that depthwise‑separable models consistently fail to recover from perturbations while residual models show partial recovery. Interestingly, the same preprocessing that hinders clean predictions leaves adversarial predictions largely intact, offering a measurable detection signal, and the study also finds that typical image‑quality metrics do not reliably indicate defense success.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 2

A Comprehensive Review of One-Pixel Attack: Research Status, Taxonomy, Applications, Regulation Policy and Future Directions

The paper reviews one‑pixel attacks (OPAs), highlighting their extreme adversarial fragility across domains such as medical diagnosis, autonomous driving, biometrics, and quantum communication. It presents a PRISMA‑guided synthesis of studies from 2017 to 2026, offering a unified taxonomy that covers algorithmic foundations, black‑box evolutionary optimization, hybrid and program‑synthesis attacks, defence mechanisms, interpretability tools, and domain‑specific vulnerabilities. The review identifies dominant Differential Evolution strategies, emerging efficiency‑optimized and saliency‑guided methods, and gaps in dataset diversity, transferability, and evaluation standards, while proposing future research directions and a regulatory framework for robustness testing and AI security governance.

By Mirza Niaz Morshed, Md. Masudul Islam, Galib Muhammad Shahriar Himel, Md. Aslam Uddin, Hui Liu, Md. Shafiqul Islam
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 22

A Unified Evaluation Framework of Physical Adversarial Robustness in the Edge VLM Era

The paper introduces a unified evaluation framework for assessing the physical adversarial robustness of Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) deployed at the edge. It defines a conditional attack success rate (cASR) metric that counts only images where the model still localizes objects under a gray occluder, and categorizes failures into omission, substitution, and displacement. Benchmarking shows that compact grounding VLMs can be as vulnerable as traditional object detectors, with omission being the only failure visible to downstream systems, while displacement and substitution pose potentially more dangerous risks, especially under distribution shift.

By Eric Liang, Alan Luo, Kaiwen Yuan
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 28

RePAIR: Inverting Backdoor Attacks in Semantic Segmentation

RePAIR is a post‑hoc, label‑free defense for semantic segmentation models that counters backdoor attacks by inferring victim‑target relationships from unlabeled images and correcting predictions in feature space and output space. It localizes suspicious pixels by comparing classifier head outputs with internal semantic evidence, applying conservative constraints to avoid harming clean predictions. Experiments demonstrate that RePAIR significantly reduces attack success across various segmentation architectures while largely preserving clean performance.

By Arnold Brosch, Kira Maag