The paper evaluates six preprocessing defenses against adversarial attacks on depthwise‑separable CNNs, the dominant architecture in edge vision systems, and finds that these defenses consistently fail to recover clean predictions for such models, whereas a residual architecture shows partial recovery. The study reveals that the same preprocessing steps that break clean predictions leave adversarial predictions largely intact, creating a measurable asymmetry that can be exploited for detection without retraining or architectural changes. It also demonstrates that common image quality metrics do not reliably indicate defense effectiveness, highlighting a methodological gap in current evaluation practices.
By Jannatul Masruk Mukta, Rifa Sanjida, Adrita Rahman Tory, Md. Saifur Rahman, Khondokar Fida Hasan
arXiv:2509.20411v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Machine learning-based cybersecurity systems are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, while Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) act a...
By Tharcisse Ndayipfukamiye, Jianguo Ding, Doreen Sebastian Sarwatt, Adamu Gaston Philipo, Huansheng Ning
The paper examines how preprocessing defenses, commonly used to protect edge vision systems, perform on depthwise‑separable CNNs versus residual architectures. Six preprocessing methods were tested against adversarial attacks, revealing that depthwise‑separable models consistently fail to recover from perturbations while residual models show partial recovery. Interestingly, the same preprocessing that hinders clean predictions leaves adversarial predictions largely intact, offering a measurable detection signal, and the study also finds that typical image‑quality metrics do not reliably indicate defense success.
arXiv:2505. 03646v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adversarial robustness of deep autoencoders (AEs) has received less attention than that of discriminative models, although their compressed latent representations induce ill-conditioned mappings that can amplify small input perturbations and destabilize reconstructions.
By Chethan Krishnamurthy Ramanaik, Arjun Roy, Tobias Callies, Eirini Ntoutsi
arXiv:2607. 04145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adversarial attacks guide and provide additional training and test data for both adversarial training and adversarial robustness validation, and expose the 'piecewise linearity' of deep learning based models.
By Naman Goyal, Milan Chaudhari
The paper introduces Fast Preemptive Robustification (FPR), a lightweight defense that enhances the robustness of deep neural networks against transferable adversarial attacks. By sharpening Laplacian responses through a single 3×3 channel‑wise convolution, FPR eliminates the need for surrogate models, iterative optimization, or specialized training. Experiments show that FPR lowers untargeted attack success rates by 12.7% and reduces targeted attack success from 10.7% to 4.1%.
By Jiaming Liang, Chi-Man Pun