PorTEXTO: A European Portuguese Benchmark for Visual Text Extraction
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The paper adapts the compact PP‑OCRv6 recognizer for historical text recognition and compares it to a conventional CRNN across various training regimes, including generalized pretraining, domain‑specific training, corpus‑level fine‑tuning, and manuscript‑specific few‑shot adaptation on multilingual Latin and Arabic scripts. While PP‑OCRv6 does not always beat the CRNN when trained from scratch, heterogeneous pretraining significantly improves its generalization. Additionally, fine‑tuned PP‑OCRv6 can surpass a large vision‑language model (Qwen3.5‑based Medusa) that is specifically tailored for historical Latin‑script handwriting recognition.
arXiv:2607. 03836v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite remarkable progress in machine translation, Vision Language Models (VLMs) struggle on historical manuscripts, a domain that stresses core Natural Language Processing (NLP) capabilities: low-resource transliteration, archaic vocabulary, and noisy input signals.
The paper evaluates open-source OCR, LLM, and VLM systems on a high‑risk public sector task: extracting structured data from student application documents. Results show that VLMs generally outperform OCR+LLM pipelines, yet only 4 of 35 configurations achieve F1 scores above 0.5, with most combinations scoring below 0.25. Model size and input quality, especially preserving OCR structure, are critical factors influencing performance.
arXiv:2605. 16409v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Optical character recognition (OCR) and multilingual scene-text understanding remain challenging for multimodal large language models (MLLMs), particularly in real-world images containing small or degraded text, cluttered layouts, occlusion, handwriting, and complex typography.
The paper introduces a controlled benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on key‑value pair extraction from documents with varying levels of OCR noise. It tests 136 configurations across five instruction‑tuned open‑weight LLMs, three datasets, and four text‑quality conditions, using deterministic decoding to generate 17,688 document‑level inferences. The study finds that clean‑text performance does not reliably predict real‑world robustness, model rankings can reverse under noisy conditions, and few‑shot demonstrations do not always improve accuracy, highlighting reliability risks in OCR‑to‑LLM pipelines.
arXiv:2610.34148v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Optical character recognition (OCR) systems depend strongly on the scale and diversity of their training data. One approach to document OCR first analy...