arXiv Machine Learning By Ahmad Ishaque Karimi, Uvini Balasuriya Mudiyanselage, Kookjin Lee

Physics-Informed Foresight Pruning for Sparse PINN Solvers of Nonlinear PDEs

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often use over‑parameterized models, raising questions about necessary capacity and effective pruning. This study introduces physics‑informed spectrum‑aware pruning (PI‑SAP), which assigns saliency based on PDE residual sensitivity, and compares it to standard NTK‑SAP. Experiments on several nonlinear PDEs show PI‑SAP consistently preserves residual fidelity and remains competitive under aggressive sparsity, though no single criterion is optimal across all equations or sparsity levels.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations

arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.

By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 4

On the training of physics-informed neural operators for solving parametric partial differential equations

Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning.