arXiv:2606. 18175v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a numerical method for the forward solution of nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) in which Bellman-Kalaba quasilinearization reduces the nonlinear problem to a sequence of linear subproblems, each discretized by collocation onto a trial space that is linear in its parameters and solved by a single direct linear least-squares QR factorization.
By Gbenga T. Awojinrin, Abdul-Akeem Olawoyin, Rami M. Younis
arXiv:2609.24947v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Neural operators evaluate parametric partial differential equations cheaply but degrade sharply outside their training distribution. Physics-informed n...
By S. Mohammad Mousavi, Teeratorn Kadeethum, Nikolaos Bouklas, Somdatta Goswami
arXiv:2606. 27354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural surrogate models offer fast approximate mappings from PDE parameters to solutions, but they typically treat solving as a purely statistical task: once trained, they struggle to correct their own constraint violations and extrapolate beyond the training distribution.
By Haina Jiang, Liam Wang, Peng-Chen Chen, Min Seop Kwak, Seungryong Kim, Brian Bell, Jeong Joon Park
The paper evaluates the robustness of Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) against noisy data in inverse problems, comparing them to a finite element method (FEM) plus optimizer baseline. Experiments on viscosity identification in 1D Burgers’ equation and 2D/3D Taylor‑Green Vortex with additive Gaussian noise show that PINNs, while requiring less human expertise, are outperformed by the traditional FEM approach in accuracy (e.g., RMSE 0.01 vs. 0.0013 for 2D Taylor‑Green with σ=1). PINNs do, however, exhibit better scaling with problem complexity, and the study highlights specific training failures that must be addressed for PINNs to become more competitive.
By Aleksandra Jekic, Afroditi Natsaridou, Signe Riemer-S{\o}rensen, Helge Langseth, Odd Erik Gundersen
arXiv:2602.08515v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: This work investigates shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving forward and inverse problems governed by nonlinear partia...
By Muhammad Luthfi Shahab, Imam Mukhlash, Hadi Susanto
arXiv:2605. 04853v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose HIN-LRI, a hybrid framework that augments a classical numerical solver with a neural operator trained to correct the solver's structured truncation error.
By Zhangyong Liang, Huanhuan Gao
arXiv:2608.29448v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often face ill-conditioned objectives that limit high-accuracy training. Dense quasi-Newton methods improve...
By Guangyuan Wang, Mads Toftrup, Sebastian Loeschcke, Yixuan Wang, Anima Anandkumar
arXiv:2602. 12706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Heechang Kim, Qianying Cao, Hyomin Shin, Seungchul Lee, George Em Karniadakis, Minseok Choi
arXiv:2606. 12337v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to computational mechanics and are commonly solved by adjoint-based optimization, while physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible alternative.
By Zhen Zhang, Alessandro Alla, George Em Karniadakis
arXiv:2608. 08322v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks applied to the level-set formulation of interface advection commonly augment the residual and initial-condition losses with an eikonal regulariser, penalising the deviation of $\|\nabla\phi\|$ from unity.
By Muhammad Akbar Khan
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
By Zhiwen Yu, Derong Yang, Liujian Zhang, Kaixiang Yang, Peilin Zhan, Jianmin Lv, Jane You, C. L. Philip Chen
arXiv:2606. 21828v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Neural operators are increasingly used to warm-start Newton solvers for nonlinear PDEs, on the premise that a low test error places the initial guess inside the basin of attraction.
By Jaemin Oh, Youngkyu Lee, Jerome Darbon, George Em Karniadakis