arXiv:2607. 02194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers.
arXiv:2602. 06842v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning-based hybrid iterative methods (DL-HIMs) integrate classical numerical solvers with neural operators, utilizing their complementary spectral biases to accelerate convergence.
arXiv:2606. 27354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural surrogate models offer fast approximate mappings from PDE parameters to solutions, but they typically treat solving as a purely statistical task: once trained, they struggle to correct their own constraint violations and extrapolate beyond the training distribution.
arXiv:2605. 23391v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for coupled multiphysics systems suffer systematic accuracy degradation as inter-equation coupling strengthens.
The paper introduces a method to amortize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) across related partial differential equations (PDEs) by explicitly modeling equation relationships in an operator graph. Coefficient vectors encode numerical parameters, while the graph hypernetwork generates diagonal codes that initialize a meta‑trained factorized PINN for each target equation. Experiments on scalar convection‑diffusion‑reaction, two‑field Fisher‑KPP, and a capacitively coupled plasma model show that term‑based descriptors and graph conditioning improve solution accuracy compared to coefficient‑vector conditioning, especially for high‑reaction and coupled systems.
arXiv:2606. 18175v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a numerical method for the forward solution of nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) in which Bellman-Kalaba quasilinearization reduces the nonlinear problem to a sequence of linear subproblems, each discretized by collocation onto a trial space that is linear in its parameters and solved by a single direct linear least-squares QR factorization.
The paper introduces a framework for evaluating how well learned states from neural PDE solvers can be reused in new contexts. By separating solution accuracy, learning contribution, and numerical utility through paired state comparisons and cost accounting, the authors audit 12 papers and conduct experiments on linear PDE families, Fourier neural operators, and convolutional networks. Their results show that matched state comparisons and downstream computational evidence can lead to significant savings in conjugate‑gradient iterations and demonstrate finite‑budget pretraining value.
arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.
The paper proposes a method to amortize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) across related partial differential equations (PDEs) by explicitly modeling equation relationships in an operator graph. Coefficient vectors encode numerical parameters, while the graph hypernetwork generates diagonal codes that initialize a meta‑trained factorized PINN for each target equation. Experiments on scalar convection‑diffusion‑reaction, two‑field Fisher‑KPP, and a capacitively coupled plasma model show that term‑based descriptors and graph conditioning improve solution accuracy compared to coefficient‑vector conditioning alone.
LPINNs introduces a minimal modification to physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) by applying input‑dependent localization functions to the first hidden layer, creating receptive fields without domain partitioning. Across 13 localization families tested on a harmonic oscillator, a long‑interval heat equation, and a 4‑dimensional fourth‑order problem, three configurations—fixed Gaussian, inverse‑quadratic with learnable parameters, and fixed bump—significantly reduced solution error compared to the baseline. However, the benefit is not universal; many families performed worse, and only the inverse‑quadratic family consistently outperformed the baseline on all three equations.
arXiv:2503.19081v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) aim to learn generalizable representations of physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PD...
arXiv:2609.07814v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) struggle on PDEs whose governing physics varies across the domain. We trace this to a structural property of s...