arXiv Machine Learning By Zeyuan Ding, Wenhai Liu, Yang Xu, Jiayu Hu, Yinda Chen, Yi Zhang, Yong Dai, Jian Tang, Xiaozhu Ju

Pelican-VLA 0.5: Attending Before Acting Benefits Generalization

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 06655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this report, we present Pelican-VLA 0.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 1

Correcting WHERE, Preserving HOW: Compositional Generalization for Vision-Language-Action Models via Referential Guidance

arXiv:2609.38616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable flexible action generation, their generalization across diverse environmental elements, including ma...

By Yanyan Zhang, Disheng Liu, Xinpeng Li, Chaoda Song, Mohsen Hariri, Debargha Ganguly, Wang Yang, Kai Ye, Bryce Grant, Vipin Chaudhary, Yu Yin
arXiv AI
Oct 7

EgoLAP: Learning from Egocentric Human Data through Language-Action Reasoning

EgoLAP is a VLA pre‑training framework that learns from both human and robot trajectories by expressing motion intent as temporally abstracted language actions linked to motion‑level reasoning grounded in scene geometry, physics, and object affordances. It jointly trains on a shared language‑based action chain‑of‑thought, enabling the transfer of human experience to robot control. In extensive real‑world and simulated experiments, EgoLAP achieves 80.1% mean real‑world task progress, a 2.3× improvement over alternative action representations, and outperforms composite reasoning formats.

By Lihan Zha, Shresth Grover, Tenny Yin, Samuel M. Bateman, Hengkai Pan, Mengchao Zhang, Aykut Onol, Allen Z. Ren, Dhruv Shah, Anirudha Majumdar
arXiv AI
2d ago

Beyond Actions: Learning Future Operation Targets for Vision-Language-Action Models

The paper introduces Action–Future Coupled Effect Learning (AFCE), a method that shifts the primary prediction target of vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies from action chunks to future‑grounded physical Effects. AFCE constructs temporally ordered Effect tokens from demonstrations, robot responses, and visual transitions, and uses reconstruction objectives to preserve executable detail and physical change. On the DexJoCo benchmark, AFCE achieves a 50.97% overall success rate, outperforming baseline policies by 11.82 and 15.21 percentage points and excelling on all five bimanual tasks, underscoring the benefit of Effect supervision for coordinated dexterous manipulation.

By Min Lin, Bokai Zhou, Jianqi Lin, Kaiyuan Yang, Yicheng Chang, Junjie Yu, Xiaofan Liu, Jianhua Han, Rui Li, Shen Zhao, Xiaodan Liang
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

Beyond Data Scaling: Representation-Centric Continued Pre-training for Vision-Language-Action Models

The paper introduces VLAct, a Vision‑Language‑Action model that focuses on representation‑centric continued pre‑training rather than merely scaling robot data. VLAct is trained on diverse, multi‑embodiment robot data and preserves a broad VLM prior while encouraging shared action semantics across embodiments. Experiments across simulation, real‑world, and unseen‑embodiment settings show that VLAct consistently outperforms existing industrial VLA systems, achieving high success rates with only a modest compute budget and open‑source data.

By Senqiao Yang, Chengyao Wang, Yuxin Chen, Zixuan Wang, Longxiang Tang, Haokun Gui, Jinhui Ye, Changsheng Lu, Xiaoyang Wu, Mingkang Zhu, Pengguang Chen, Shu Liu, Zhuotao Tian, Hengshuang Zhao, Bei Yu, Jiaya Jia