arXiv:2606. 24172v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: More than a billion people communicate in Indic languages, yet the natural language processing infrastructure serving them remains fragmented and underdeveloped.
By Ritwik Banerjee, Lav R. Varshney
The paper introduces grounded glossary generation, a structured NLP task that asks models to recover semantically meaningful Sanskrit phrases and provide translation‑grounded meanings from a sloka‑translation pair, mirroring the traditional patha commentary practice. A benchmark of 31,316 sloka‑translation‑glossary triples from the Valmiki Ramayana and Srimad Bhagavatam is built, evaluated with Jaccard for phrase recovery and Meaning Faithfulness for semantic consistency. Experiments with Gemma‑3n‑E4B, Gemma‑3‑12B, Phi‑4, and Qwen3.5‑9B show that instruction fine‑tuning outperforms prompting, and explicit segmentation further improves results, though over‑segmentation of sandhi and samasa compounds remains the main error source, highlighting morphological modeling as a key bottleneck.
By Manoj Balaji Jagadeeshan, Sai Pragnaan Marala, Pawan Goyal
arXiv:2605. 28965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Linking free-text phenotype descriptions to ontology terms, typically referred to as phenotype annotation, is essential for the cross-study integration of comparative morphological data.
By James P. Balhoff, Hilmar Lapp
The paper compares generative and encoder-based neural models for multilingual Named Entity Recognition (NER) across the eleven languages of the Naamapadam benchmark. Five classic model families, four decoder-only large language models fine‑tuned with LoRA and 4‑bit NF4 quantisation, and nine generative models in zero‑to‑5‑shot inference were evaluated under strict CoNLL span‑level metrics. Encoder-based models (mBERT and XLM‑R) achieved substantially higher F1 scores—up to 0.675 on Hindi—than any generative architecture, with gaps of 7.5–40 percentage points; the best few‑shot result reached only 28% of the encoder baseline. The study identifies three language clusters (encoder‑dominant, partial‑coverage, and failure‑zone) and offers deployment guidelines based on transfer learning and low‑resource NLP principles.
By Jakkala Mahesh, Jatavath Shravan Kumar, Komalla Shivani, Sujoy Sarkar
arXiv:2607. 23344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Named Entity Recognition (NER) for low-resource languages such as Marathi remains a challenging task due to limited annotated resources and linguistic complexity.
By Hariom Ingle, Ronit Ghode, Ishwari Gondkar, Jidnyasa Harad, Raviraj Joshi
The paper evaluates whether diachronic word embeddings can track semantic change in Sanskrit, an ancient low‑resource language with complex phonological and morphological features. A 2.7‑million‑token corpus covering four canonical periods is processed with a neural sandhi splitter and lemmatizer, and per‑period embeddings are trained. Validation against a curated set of 21 historical shifts shows that 19 shifts align with philological expectations, supporting the method’s applicability to Sanskrit.
By Tanay Agrawal