arXiv Computation and Language By Jakkala Mahesh, Jatavath Shravan Kumar, Komalla Shivani, Sujoy Sarkar

Generative vs. Encoder Models for Multilingual NER: A Comprehensive Empirical Study on Naamapadam

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper compares generative and encoder-based neural models for multilingual Named Entity Recognition (NER) across the eleven languages of the Naamapadam benchmark. Five classic model families, four decoder-only large language models fine‑tuned with LoRA and 4‑bit NF4 quantisation, and nine generative models in zero‑to‑5‑shot inference were evaluated under strict CoNLL span‑level metrics. Encoder-based models (mBERT and XLM‑R) achieved substantially higher F1 scores—up to 0.675 on Hindi—than any generative architecture, with gaps of 7.5–40 percentage points; the best few‑shot result reached only 28% of the encoder baseline. The study identifies three language clusters (encoder‑dominant, partial‑coverage, and failure‑zone) and offers deployment guidelines based on transfer learning and low‑resource NLP principles.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

Assessment of Generative Named Entity Recognition in the Era of Large Language Models

The paper evaluates open‑source large language models (LLMs) for both flat and nested named entity recognition (NER) tasks, comparing them to traditional encoder‑based models and decoder‑based LLMs using in‑context learning. It shows that with parameter‑efficient fine‑tuning and structured output formats (e.g., inline brackets or XML), LLMs can match or exceed the performance of conventional NER systems, and that their NER abilities arise from instruction following rather than memorization. Additionally, fine‑tuning for NER minimally affects, and can even improve, the LLMs’ general capabilities on other benchmarks.

By Qi Zhan, Yile Wang, Hui Huang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

Cross-Dialect NER for Bangla Regional Dialects Using Leave-One-Dialect-Out Cross-Validation and Explainable AI

The paper introduces a cross-dialect Named Entity Recognition (NER) framework for Bangla, leveraging the ANCHOLIK-NER dataset that covers five major regional dialects. Using a Leave-One-Dialect-Out Cross-Validation strategy, eight transformer-based models were evaluated, with Multilingual-E5 Large achieving the best performance (F1 up to 97.26% on Mymensingh, 82.38% on Chattogram). Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) revealed that the models rely mainly on the surface form of entity words rather than surrounding context, suggesting a direction for future improvement.

By Shamim Rahim Refat, Faika Fairuj Preotee, Shuvashis Sarker, Shifat Islam, Bidyarthi Paul, Mohammad Ashraful Hoque
arXiv AI
Aug 20

NE-BERT: A Multilingual Language Model for Nine Northeast Indian Languages

NE‑BERT is a multilingual encoder trained on about 8.3 million sentences from nine Northeast Indian languages plus Hindi and English. Using weighted sampling and a custom SentencePiece tokenizer, it achieves significantly lower perplexity than IndicBERT‑V2, MuRIL, and mBERT, and improves tokenization fertility. The model also addresses vocabulary fragmentation in extremely low‑resource languages through aggressive upsampling, and its effectiveness is validated on part‑of‑speech tagging for three of the languages.

By Badal Nyalang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

Embedding Initialization for Unseen Low-resource Languages in Multilingual NMT: A Case Study on Limbum-English Translation

arXiv:2608. 07629v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual neural machine translation models such as NLLB-200 cover 200 languages but leave thousands unsupported, including most Grassfields Bantu languages of Cameroon.

By Samiratu Ntohsi, Neza David Tuyishimire, Anesu Kafesu, Marvin Ogore, Samuel Oluwajunwonlo Babalola, Oche Ankeli