arXiv AI By Ritwik Banerjee, Lav R. Varshney

A P\={a}ninian Foundation for Indic Language Processing

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 24172v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: More than a billion people communicate in Indic languages, yet the natural language processing infrastructure serving them remains fragmented and underdeveloped.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Pad\=artha: Ontology-Grounded Fine-Grained NER Benchmark for Classical Sanskrit

Padàrtha is the first ontology‑grounded fine‑grained Named Entity Recognition benchmark for Classical Sanskrit, built on the Mahêbhárata epic. Its tag set, derived from the Nyáya‑Vai’séka ontological system, contains 18 fine‑grained categories under 10 nodes and maps to five standard coarse tags, ensuring compatibility with existing benchmarks. The dataset includes over 12.6K expert‑annotated entries and 108,335 entity mentions across 73,632 verses, plus a 5,000‑verse test set designed to challenge rare mentions, and the study compares generative NER models to traditional architectures, noting performance drops at finer granularity and difficulties with unseen entities.

By Sujoy Sarkar, Pretam Ray, Paramhans Shah, Manoj Balaji Jagadeeshan, Akash Gairola, Arjuna S R, Pawan Goyal
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 28

BHARATI: Morphology-Aware Tokenizers for Classical Indian Languages with Subword Fertility Analysis

arXiv:2607. 23319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard subword tokenization algorithms such as Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and SentencePiece are trained predominantly on modern language corpora and produce inefficient segmentations when applied to classical Indian languages.

By Poornima Kumaresan, Pavithra Muruganantham, Lakshmi Rajendran, Santhosh Sivasubramani
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Generative vs. Encoder Models for Multilingual NER: A Comprehensive Empirical Study on Naamapadam

The paper compares generative and encoder-based neural models for multilingual Named Entity Recognition (NER) across the eleven languages of the Naamapadam benchmark. Five classic model families, four decoder-only large language models fine‑tuned with LoRA and 4‑bit NF4 quantisation, and nine generative models in zero‑to‑5‑shot inference were evaluated under strict CoNLL span‑level metrics. Encoder-based models (mBERT and XLM‑R) achieved substantially higher F1 scores—up to 0.675 on Hindi—than any generative architecture, with gaps of 7.5–40 percentage points; the best few‑shot result reached only 28% of the encoder baseline. The study identifies three language clusters (encoder‑dominant, partial‑coverage, and failure‑zone) and offers deployment guidelines based on transfer learning and low‑resource NLP principles.

By Jakkala Mahesh, Jatavath Shravan Kumar, Komalla Shivani, Sujoy Sarkar
arXiv AI
Jul 8

Rethinking Indic AI from a Lens of Cultural Heritage Preservation

arXiv:2607. 06544v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) makes inroads into different parts of the Indian subcontinent, there is significant interest in studying how AI impacts the linguistic and cultural foundations of this civilization.

By Aparna Madva, Sharath Srivatsa, Srinath Srinivasa, Tulika Saha