arXiv AI By Roser Batlle-Roca, Woosung Choi, Joan Serr\`a, Fabio Morreale, Wei-Hsiang Liao, Xavier Serra, Emilia G\'omez, Yuki Mitsufuji

On the Human and Computer Alignment of Attribute-Based Music Matches

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces the MATCHA dataset, comprising 1,105 perceptual assessments from 83 experts on attribute-based music matches across five musical attributes—melody, harmony, rhythm, voice, and timbre. A triplet-based forced-choice experiment with 300 cases, including plagiarism, cover songs, and AI-generated music, was used to gather these judgments. Results show measurable agreement among participants and partial alignment with computational similarity measures, highlighting the need for perceptually grounded evaluation in generative AI for music.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Towards AI-Generated Music Plagiarism Detection as a Version Identification Problem

The paper addresses the challenge of detecting plagiarism in music generated by AI, noting that traditional binary notions of plagiarism are insufficient due to nuanced musical elements. It evaluates whether existing music version identification models, originally designed for human covers, can transfer to human-to-AI plagiarism detection. The authors introduce COPYCAT, a large benchmark of 350,654 pairs derived from real plagiarism cases and augmented with generative re‑synthesis and DSP obfuscations, and demonstrate that a supervised embedding‑shift approach significantly improves detection performance over simple distance thresholding.

By Fotis Koutsikos, Ioannis Prokopiou, Spyridon Kantarelis, Vassilis Lyberatos, Pantelis Vikatos, Athanasios Aidinis, Themos Stafylakis, Athanasios Voulodimos, Giorgos Stamou
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

TrueMuse: A Benchmark for Data Attribution in Text-to-Music Models

TrueMuse is a new benchmark designed to evaluate data attribution in text-to-music models. It consists of a controlled dataset created by fine‑tuning three diffusion‑based models on curated attribution samples, providing known attribution targets. The benchmark covers four settings—melodic structure, timbral characteristics, artist‑level style, and genre‑level patterns—across 133 attributes, 648 models, and 95,456 generated samples, and is used to assess existing black‑box attribution methods along several dimensions.

By Jiawei Yu, Jian Liu
arXiv AI
Aug 25

ONOTE: Hypergraph-Grounded Omnimodal Reasoning for Computational Music Science

ONOTE is a unified framework that treats music as a scientifically structured domain of measurable cross-representation correspondences, focusing on omnimodal notation processing centered on sheet music. It introduces a test-only benchmark drawing from diverse musical sources—including staff, Jianpu, and tablature—across varied genres, instruments, and structural conditions, with aligned multimodal derivatives. The framework supports four complementary tasks—score understanding, notation conversion, audio transcription, and symbolic generation—while constructing a provenance-bearing proposition hypergraph from external music-theory materials for evidence retrieval and deterministic validity checks.

By Menghe Ma, Siqing Wei, Yuecheng Xing, Ziyue Zhu, Zhenghong Lin, Yaheng Wang, Fanhong Meng, Peijun Han, Luu Anh Tuan, Haoran Luo
arXiv AI
Sep 16

MUUNRiver-Bench: Diagnosing Relation-Dependent Music Retrieval with Multimodal Instructions

MUUNRiver-Bench is a diagnostic benchmark for music retrieval that uses natural‑language instructions to define relevance for reference‑audio queries. It contains 3,440 tracks across 13 genres and 116 sub‑genres and covers seven tasks such as similar‑music, style‑preserving lyric‑rewriting, cover, and segment retrieval. Experiments with six models in eight configurations show that acoustic encoders favor local identity while text‑aligned encoders favor semantic relations, and that instruction‑aware and audio‑text fusion systems do not consistently outperform their backbones.

By Zhancheng Guo, Congren Dai, Shangda Wu, Jianhuai Hu, Danni Zhao, Xiaobing Li, Maosong Sun