← Back to all news
arXiv Machine Learning By Fotis Koutsikos, Ioannis Prokopiou, Spyridon Kantarelis, Vassilis Lyberatos, Pantelis Vikatos, Athanasios Aidinis, Themos Stafylakis, Athanasios Voulodimos, Giorgos Stamou

Towards AI-Generated Music Plagiarism Detection as a Version Identification Problem

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper addresses the challenge of detecting plagiarism in music generated by AI, noting that traditional binary notions of plagiarism are insufficient due to nuanced musical elements. It evaluates whether existing music version identification models, originally designed for human covers, can transfer to human-to-AI plagiarism detection. The authors introduce COPYCAT, a large benchmark of 350,654 pairs derived from real plagiarism cases and augmented with generative re‑synthesis and DSP obfuscations, and demonstrate that a supervised embedding‑shift approach significantly improves detection performance over simple distance thresholding.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Sep 2

On the Human and Computer Alignment of Attribute-Based Music Matches

The paper introduces the MATCHA dataset, comprising 1,105 perceptual assessments from 83 experts on attribute-based music matches across five musical attributes—melody, harmony, rhythm, voice, and timbre. A triplet-based forced-choice experiment with 300 cases, including plagiarism, cover songs, and AI-generated music, was used to gather these judgments. Results show measurable agreement among participants and partial alignment with computational similarity measures, highlighting the need for perceptually grounded evaluation in generative AI for music.

By Roser Batlle-Roca, Woosung Choi, Joan Serr\`a, Fabio Morreale, Wei-Hsiang Liao, Xavier Serra, Emilia G\'omez, Yuki Mitsufuji
safety
More like this →