arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

MT-WAM: Reorienting the One-Pass Predictive Representation Toward Action Generation

MT‑WAM enhances the Fast‑WAM framework by adding complementary supervision for future 2‑D point trajectories and visual features while keeping the original training objectives. A lightweight dual‑stream branch and structured attention mask isolate motion‑specific processing, and motion‑stream tokens provide additional dynamics cues to the action expert. During inference, MT‑WAM skips future‑video prediction, using cached video and motion information to achieve higher success rates on LIBERO, LIBERO‑Plus, RoboTwin 2.0 Clean2Rand, and several real‑world tasks.

By Yiguang Yang, Jiankun Peng, Xiaoming Wang, Yiran Zhang, Zhibo Fang
arXiv Computer Vision
1d ago

CtrlWAM: Controllable World Action Models with Aligned Intent and Foresight

CtrlWAM introduces a controllable world action model that jointly predicts actions (intent) and visual futures (foresight). By executing perturbed actions in a simulator and pairing them with noised visual outcomes, it aligns action predictions with their visual consequences, using warped video–action noise schedules to maintain visual layout responsiveness. The model extends beyond ego‑only control to multiple agent streams, improving action forecasts, video–action agreement, and command following in driving and robotics experiments.

By Chensheng Peng, Wenhao Ding, Ran Tian, Zewei Zhou, Jef Packer, Maximilian Igl, Peter Karkus, Yan Wang, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Boris Ivanovic, Marco Pavone, Yuxiao Chen
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 15

PhysBrain 1.5: From Vision-Language Models to Physical Foundation Models

PhysBrain 1.5 is a unified vision‑language model that learns to understand physical environments, generate actions, and predict future states by encoding language, end‑effector motion, and dense visual targets as discrete sequences and training them with autoregressive next‑token prediction. The model is pre‑trained on human interaction videos and fine‑tuned on human demonstrations, robot trajectories, and simulated experience, achieving an average score of 72.5 across 28 embodied understanding benchmarks and outperforming other open‑source models on 14 of them. It also demonstrates the ability to produce end‑effector trajectories and predict future scenes with spatially aligned RGB, depth, and robot‑mask outputs.

By DeepCybo Team, Yu Bin, Haipeng Cao, Zheng Chang, Kai Chen, Youning Chen, Kailin Deng, Yichao Du, Xiaotong Fu, Haoyang Ge, Yunlong Guo, Chenliu Hao, Jiyan He, Xuguo He, Yakun Hou, Kai Hu, Cong Huang, Tuopusen Huang, Yu Huang, Hong Li, Peize Li, Shijie Lian, Xiaopeng Lin, Yun Lin, Haibao Liu, Haochen Liu, Qiuzhi Liu, Shengcai Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Tao Luo, Peng Ren, Shuo Ren, Chaoyi Ruan, Zhaolong Shen, Yukun Shi, Qiyuan Su, Yuxuan Tian, Yining Wang, Changti Wu, Hao Wu, Xueyin Xu, Ruoqi Yang, Zhaoyang Yang, Hang Yuan, Zhaoyang Zeng, Hanwen Zhang, Ruimeng Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yibo Zhang, Yuxiang Zhang, Zhirui Zhang, Ziyi Zhang, Zubin Zheng, Zishen Zhuang