arXiv Computer Vision

The Right Future for Action: Learning Action-Relevant Predictive States in World Action Models

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

MT-WAM: Reorienting the One-Pass Predictive Representation Toward Action Generation

MT‑WAM enhances the Fast‑WAM framework by adding complementary supervision for future 2‑D point trajectories and visual features while keeping the original training objectives. A lightweight dual‑stream branch and structured attention mask isolate motion‑specific processing, and motion‑stream tokens provide additional dynamics cues to the action expert. During inference, MT‑WAM skips future‑video prediction, using cached video and motion information to achieve higher success rates on LIBERO, LIBERO‑Plus, RoboTwin 2.0 Clean2Rand, and several real‑world tasks.

By Yiguang Yang, Jiankun Peng, Xiaoming Wang, Yiran Zhang, Zhibo Fang
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 8

Video Prediction Policy 2: Predict Better, Act Better

Video Prediction Policy 2 (VPP2) is a new world action model that improves zero‑shot generalization for both video prediction and action generation. It achieves this by pretraining a large, diverse manipulation video dataset with event‑level supervision, then distilling the model into a single‑step visual planner and adding a mixture‑of‑transformers action module. Experiments show VPP2 outperforms leading baselines on open‑ended video prediction, real‑world zero‑shot manipulation, and several challenging benchmarks.

By Yanjiang Guo, Haodong Yan, Zhide Zhong, Zhongru Zhang, Qingyuan Yang, Qingzhou Lu, Xiaoyu Chen, Yen-Jen Wang, Shuying Deng, Chenghan Yang, Puzhen Yuan, Chenxin Liu, Tun Ban, Xiang Zhu, Yichen Liu, Kun Feng, Haoang Li, Jianyu Chen
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 2

CtrlWAM: Controllable World Action Models with Aligned Intent and Foresight

CtrlWAM introduces a controllable world action model that jointly predicts actions (intent) and visual futures (foresight). By executing perturbed actions in a simulator and pairing them with noised visual outcomes, it aligns action predictions with their visual consequences, using warped video–action noise schedules to maintain visual layout responsiveness. The model extends beyond ego‑only control to multiple agent streams, improving action forecasts, video–action agreement, and command following in driving and robotics experiments.

By Chensheng Peng, Wenhao Ding, Ran Tian, Zewei Zhou, Jef Packer, Maximilian Igl, Peter Karkus, Yan Wang, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Boris Ivanovic, Marco Pavone, Yuxiao Chen