arXiv:2608. 11605v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World Action Models (WAMs) couple future visual prediction with robot action generation, enabling policies to model how the physical world evolves during interaction.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608.22067v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: World-Action Models (WAMs) build robot control on video-generation backbones, which jointly predict dense future visual trajectories and robot action...
MT‑WAM enhances the Fast‑WAM framework by adding complementary supervision for future 2‑D point trajectories and visual features while keeping the original training objectives. A lightweight dual‑stream branch and structured attention mask isolate motion‑specific processing, and motion‑stream tokens provide additional dynamics cues to the action expert. During inference, MT‑WAM skips future‑video prediction, using cached video and motion information to achieve higher success rates on LIBERO, LIBERO‑Plus, RoboTwin 2.0 Clean2Rand, and several real‑world tasks.
arXiv:2609.37250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: World-action models (WAMs) couple future visual-state prediction with action generation. By adapting video generators or image-editing models pretrai...
arXiv:2609.23369v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generation-free world action models (WAMs) retain future-video prediction during training but act from internal video features at inference, leaving un...
arXiv:2606. 15768v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) leverage large-scale vision-language pretraining for semantic robot control, but often lack explicit foresight into how robot actions change the scene.
CtrlWAM introduces a controllable world action model that jointly predicts actions (intent) and visual futures (foresight). By executing perturbed actions in a simulator and pairing them with noised visual outcomes, it aligns action predictions with their visual consequences, using warped video–action noise schedules to maintain visual layout responsiveness. The model extends beyond ego‑only control to multiple agent streams, improving action forecasts, video–action agreement, and command following in driving and robotics experiments.