arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

GRADE: Single-Frame Generative Radar Depth Estimation Under Visual Degradation

GRADE is a method for estimating high‑fidelity metric depth from a single radar frame, even when visual sensors fail due to smoke, fog, or darkness. It first converts raw 4D radar spectra into coarse depth, then uses a latent diffusion model conditioned on this estimate to recover fine structural detail. A pixel‑space adapter incorporates any available camera cues and is trained across clear, smoke‑degraded, and occluded inputs, allowing the output to rely more on radar as visibility worsens. On a dataset of ~95K frames from 12 buildings with real smoke, GRADE achieves an MAE of 0.303 m in clear scenes and 0.313 m under smoke, outperforming existing baselines.

By Bin Zhao, Patrick Chiou, Nakul Garg
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

4D Radar Perception Algorithms for Autonomous Driving: A Review

The review surveys 4D millimeter‑wave radar perception algorithms for autonomous driving, covering signal processing, object detection, semantic segmentation, motion estimation, occupancy prediction, and dynamic scene reconstruction. It organizes the field by perception tasks, discusses radar fundamentals, data representations, and quality‑enhancement methods, and compares radar‑only learning, multimodal fusion, and cross‑modal supervision. The paper also summarizes datasets, annotations, evaluation protocols, and outlines common challenges and future research directions.

By Xumin Wu, Jun Zhou, Jilin Mei, Chen Min, Yu Hu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 1

RLG-TPV: Radar- and LiDAR-Guided Tri-Perspective View Fusion for Camera-Radar 3D Object Detection

RLG-TPV introduces a multimodal Tri-Perspective View framework that fuses camera, radar, and training‑time LiDAR data for 3D object detection. It uses radar and LiDAR to guide a ray‑deformable attention lift, refining depth distributions and providing geometric supervision for side and front planes, while radar cross‑section awareness spreads evidence spatially. On nuScenes, the method attains 0.4981 mAP and 0.5959 NDS, improving orientation and velocity accuracy by about 32 % and 31 % over the CRN baseline.

By Ahmet Mete Dokgoz, A. Enes Doruk, Hasan F. Ates