arXiv AI
LITERARYBIGFIVE: Author-Personalized Text Generation in a Unified Interpretable Space
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 24
LITERARYBIGFIVE: Author-Personalized Text Generation in a Unified Interpretable Space
Personalized text generation for authors and literary writing is essential for applications such as adaptive writing assistants, creative support tools, and computational literary analysis. However, e...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2
Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions
The paper "Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions" examines the difficulties of assessing text that is tailored to individual users’ styles. It critiques common metrics such as BLEU, embeddings, and LLM-as-judges, and introduces a style discrimination benchmark covering domain discrimination, authorship attribution, and LLM-generated personalized versus non-personalized discrimination across eight writing tasks. The study finds that ensembles of diverse evaluation metrics outperform single-evaluator approaches and offers guidance for reliable assessment of style-personalized generation.
arXiv AI
Aug 26
The Limits of Automatic Evaluation of Creativity in Large Language Models
The paper examines whether existing automatic methods can reliably assess creativity in text produced by large language models (LLMs). By collecting human ratings on 11 creativity dimensions for both human and AI short stories, the authors compare these judgments with automated metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations. The results show a significant misalignment: automated metrics and LLM judges favor AI-generated stories and show near-zero correlation with human assessments, revealing fundamental limitations in current computational approaches to evaluating creative text.
arXiv AI
Jun 30
Towards Human-Level Book-Writing Capability
arXiv:2605. 17064v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models are optimized for instruction following and agentic tasks remain poorly aligned with the requirements of high-quality creative writing.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22
Authorship identification under domain shift: a survey of stylistic measures and learned author representations
arXiv:2310.00436v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Authorship identification uses patterns in writing to infer who wrote a text, but those patterns also reflect topic, genre, and register. This surv...
arXiv AI
Sep 2
Value Over Language Model: Detecting Original Contribution in Writing
The paper introduces VOLM, a framework that quantifies how much original value a human adds to a document beyond what a language model could generate from a task description alone. Unlike existing tools that focus on stylistic detection, VOLM extracts content at varying granularities, reconstructs it with an LLM, and compares these reconstructions to those derived from the task description. Evaluations across news articles, ICLR peer reviews, and argumentative essays show that VOLM can distinguish human-authored texts from LLM-generated ones while remaining robust to content-preserving transformations.