Learning to Look Again: Loss-Gap Supervision for Free-form Crop Routing in Vision-Language Models
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The paper introduces Rendering-Free Lookahead (RFL), a method for active robot vision that selects camera motions to reveal information needed for viewpoint-dependent question answering. RFL predicts future answerability—how well a view can answer a question—using a student model trained via distillation from a privileged teacher that renders future views with 3D Gaussian Splatting. In deployment, RFL chooses camera motions without rendering, achieving a 43% improvement in mean judge score over a baseline on 377 unseen test episodes.
The paper introduces Vision‑RL2, a region‑level reinforcement learning approach that optimizes a lightweight proposal network for fine‑grained multimodal large language model (MLLM) perception. By treating coherent image regions as actions and scoring them with a frozen MLLM reader, the method selectively focuses visual resolution on evidence, reducing token usage while improving accuracy across multiple benchmarks and backbones. The approach eliminates the need for region annotations, response sampling, or reasoning trajectories, and the refined proposals enable sparse encoding that magnifies relevant evidence.
arXiv:2609.38368v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly reason over visual evidence that is cropped, segmented, retrieved, or revealed over time. Yet most VQA bench...
arXiv:2603.16932v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) typically process images at a native high-resolution, forcing a trade-off between accuracy and computational ef...
The paper introduces a free, label‑free visual evidence signal that improves fine‑grained vision‑language reasoning. By selecting image crops that maximize the model’s answer distribution peak, the method locates answer‑bearing regions without training or annotations, boosting accuracy from 70 % to 85 %. The evidence gap also complements model confidence, enabling better correctness prediction and error flagging.
arXiv:2610.13790v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How well can vision-language models (VLMs) reason about what is missing from an image? We study this question with OccludeBench, a manually curated b...