arXiv:2609.38036v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Understanding gender biases in large language models (LLMs) is increasingly important as these systems become embedded in decision-support to...
By Edoardo Bolzoni, Valerio Capraro
arXiv:2609.38036v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Understanding gender biases in large language models (LLMs) is increasingly important as these systems become embedded in decision-support tools with...
By Edoardo Bolzoni, Valerio Capraro
arXiv:2610.15961v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Emergent misalignment (EM) occurs when fine-tuning a language model to a narrow task makes it misaligned on unrelated ones. Because organizations now...
By Alex Mart\'i Guiu, Nicolas Zumarraga, Kevin O'Sullivan, Robert Jakob, Anna Hedstr\"om
arXiv:2608. 03627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated fact-checking, yet their susceptibility to gender bias in this context remains underexplored.
By Razieh Chalehchaleh, Reza Farahbakhsh, Noel Crespi
arXiv:2611.02491v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used as measurement instruments for socially consequential constructs such as hate speech, and are typically val...
By Wenchang Wang, Yue Song
The study investigates how gender assignments of candidates and evaluators influence decisions made by large language models (LLMs) in a city council voting scenario. Eight LLM-as-a-Judge and decision language models evaluated 240 synthetic professional narratives, producing 30,720 judgments. Results show that explicit candidate gender labels slightly increased the probability of a Yes vote, only nonbinary evaluator assignments had a significant effect, and decision reversals varied across models, with decision language models exhibiting fewer reversals than LLM-as-a-Judge models.
By Danial Amin, Joni Salminen, Bernard J. Jansen