The paper investigates how coordination among AI agents serving different users degrades performance compared to a single coordinating agent. Across five advanced models and 77 scenarios in four shared-resource environments—API key budgets, clinic calendars, personal assistant bookings, and merge queues—the study finds that multi‑agent teams consistently underperform, sometimes collapsing entirely, and that even with communication channels coordination overhead remains significant. The authors identify specific failure modes such as stalling, action overriding, and claim fabrication, and propose environment‑specific mitigations like team leads and procedural instructions, while releasing the MAMUBench benchmark for future research.
By Sahan Paliskara, Nattaput Namchittai, Andrew Lampinen
The study investigates how autonomous coding agents interact with technical documentation, analyzing 557 coding sessions and 33,097 pull requests. Findings reveal that agents primarily engage with agent-facing artefacts, show weak links between documentation consultation and code editing, lack explicit validation sequences, and tend to consult documentation after code changes. The authors propose a two‑lobed cycle model of agent‑documentation interaction and challenge assumptions about actionability and verifiability of agent‑friendly documentation.
arXiv:2608. 20195v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Technical documentation is written for human developers, but an increasing share of software changes is now authored by autonomous coding agents.
By Zhijun Gao, Jing Chen
arXiv:2608. 03499v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in persistent personal-agent frameworks are making human-centered agent networks realistic deployment targets: each user can be served by an AI agent that acts on the user's behalf, maintains state, and communicates with other agents through social and task relations.
By Prince Zizhuang Wang, Aojie Yuan, Haiyue Zhang, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao, Shuli Jiang
arXiv:2607. 25446v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent frameworks built on large language models (LLMs) routinely entangle three logically distinct concerns: who is on the team (organization), how members align (coordination), and which algorithm fuses their work (collaboration protocol).
By Huan Chen, Xiang Song, Jian Jin, Pan Ren, Liang-Jie Zhang
Recent advances in persistent personal-agent frameworks are making human-centered agent networks realistic deployment targets: each user can be served by an AI agent that acts on the user's behalf, maintains state, and communicates with other agents through social and task relations. In these networks, everyday tool use becomes multi-party owned-agent collaboration over personal workspaces, where files, records, tools, and policies are not directly visible across owners.
AgentRoom introduces a real‑time collaborative editing protocol that enables concurrent coding by multiple large language model agents within a CRDT‑backed shared workspace. By providing file‑level claim, status, and broadcast tools, it allows agents to coordinate directly rather than relying on serial phase handoffs or independent sampling. Experiments with five frontier coding‑CLI models show that AgentRoom reduces task abandonment and run‑to‑run variation compared to solo or parallel‑merge approaches, highlighting the importance of coordination over mere parallelism.
By Seonglae Cho, Donghyun Lee
arXiv:2607. 22917v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents have significantly improved coding and programming workflows.
By Shouren Wang
arXiv:2607. 22917v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents have significantly improved coding and programming workflows.
By Shouren Wang
arXiv:2606. 19616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous coding agents now open millions of pull requests, yet large-scale studies find their PRs are produced faster but accepted less often - a coordination and trust gap that pull-request-level telemetry cannot explain.
By Dipankar Sarkar
arXiv:2609.32965v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Multiple agents may often conflict in an organization: for example, one coding agent changes an interface in a repository, but another continues to...
By Hongyi Du, Tianyi Zhang, Weijia Zhang, Yi Yang, Haofei Yu, Kunlun Zhu, Tianxiang Dai, Shang Jiang, Zhelun Gao, Jiaxin Pei, Shang Zhu, Jiaxuan You
arXiv:2606. 02965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As large language models gain tool access and are deployed as autonomous agents capable of editing records, executing transactions, and modifying infrastructure, we still evaluate them based on the sole metric of task completion.
By Victor Ojewale, Suresh Venkatasubramanian