arXiv:2610.16601v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Processing multilingual text requires both identifying a broad range of languages and distinguishing the language of each token in inputs containing...
By Seongtae Hong, Youngjoon Jang, Seungyoon Lee, Jungseob Lee, Heuiseok Lim
arXiv:2608.10109v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Social media has become a major venue for multilingual communication, where users frequently mix multiple languages within a single utterance. Alth...
By Ghazal Kalhor, Zahra Jafari, Amirarsalan Shahbazi, Behnam Bahrak
arXiv:2610.33017v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multilingual tokenizers trained on English-dominated corpora often over-segment Indic languages, resulting in longer token sequences and increased toke...
By Binayak Mukherjeea, Moitreya Nandi, Arindam Panja
arXiv:2606. 24825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging is a foundational NLP task underpinning machine translation, information extraction, and syntactic parsing.
By Hariom Ingle, Ronit Ghode, Ishwari Gondkar, Jidnyasa Harad, Raviraj Joshi
IndicDetect is a benchmark for evaluating AI‑generated text detection in Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil. It pairs curated human‑written texts with LLM‑generated counterparts across multiple domains and generators, testing detectors under domain shift, generator shift, and adversarial perturbation. The study shows that supervised neural detectors fail to generalize to unseen generators and attacks, with Hindi experiencing the greatest degradation, indicating that robustness—not peak accuracy—is the main weakness in Indic language detectors.
By Bhaskar Ganesh Devalla, Junchao Wu, Nilesh Dokuparthi, Greeshma Yaluru, Tatiana Muniz Rodriguez, Lidia S. Chao, Derek F. Wong
The paper introduces UniLID, a lightweight language identification method that uses the UnigramLM tokenization algorithm to predict a string’s language by evaluating which language’s unigram distribution best explains the text. UniLID is data‑ and compute‑efficient, allows incremental addition of new languages without retraining, and can be integrated into existing tokenization pipelines. Experiments show competitive performance against baselines such as fasttext, GlotLID‑M, and CLD3, achieving 69% accuracy with five labeled samples per language and 89% with 25, and delivering significant gains on fine‑grained dialect identification.
By Clara Meister, Ahmetcan Yavuz, Pietro Lesci, Tiago Pimentel