Hugging Face Trending Papers

How Much Should a VLA Trust Its Reasoning? Step-Level Guidance as a Measured Action-Value Function

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The paper introduces CoC-CFG, a method that applies classifier‑free guidance to the reasoning trace of vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies, weighting each Euler step to modulate the influence of reasoning. By treating the weight selection as a Markov decision process with measured action values, the authors develop Q‑adaptive guidance that conservatively improves the controller. Experiments on the Alpasim driving simulator and the Waymo end‑to‑end benchmark show that Q‑adaptive guidance outperforms fixed weights and online RL baselines, achieving a new state‑of‑the‑art score on the hidden test set.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Oct 2

When Reasoning Helps Action: Monitoring and Steering Chain-of-Thought in Vision-Language-Action Policies

The paper introduces TRUST, a token‑level reward model that predicts the correctness of partial chain‑of‑thought (CoT) traces in vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies, enabling monitoring and selective steering of reasoning. On driving and manipulation VLA benchmarks, TRUST improves reasoning accuracy and reduces collision rates and trajectory errors, though its impact on overall task performance varies across tasks. The study defines two evaluation axes—correctability and actionability—to assess when CoT can serve as a runtime safety interface.

By Sathwik Karnik, Joseph JR. Lee, Aryaman Gupta, Somil Bansal
arXiv AI
Jun 24

Neuro-Symbolic Drive: Rule-Grounded Faithful Reasoning for Driving VLAs

arXiv:2606. 23938v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Driving VLA models incorporating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning are attractive because they leverage pretrained VLM representations and expose intermediate decisions in natural language, yet current rationales often lack the step-by-step decision semantics needed to keep the rationale causally connected to the planned motion.

By Xiangbo Gao, Xiukun Huang, Boyu Lu, Junge Zhang, Mengjie Mao, Jiachen Li, Wei Xiong, Zhengzhong Tu
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Confidence-Calibrated Inference Expansion for Evaluator-Guided Test-Time Reasoning

The paper introduces a compute‑aware three‑action controller for evaluator‑guided reasoning, deciding whether to trust the current answer, fallback, or expand inference. It scores terminal actions by predicted success and uses a rollout‑based surrogate for expansion, explicitly pricing compute cost. Experiments on width expansion and revision tasks show the controller improves utility over fixed policies while reducing online compute by about 30% and 16%, respectively, and demonstrates that evaluator‑guided reasoning is best viewed as resource allocation under uncertainty.

By Weida Liang, Kenji Kawaguchi
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

CARE: Certifying Acceleration for Vision-Language-Action Inference

The paper introduces CARE, a method for certifying accelerated inference in vision‑language‑action models. CARE uses paired rollouts on a calibration set to guarantee that the risk of acceleration‑induced failure stays below a user‑specified budget, selecting the fastest certified accelerator or falling back to the reference policy. Experiments on LIBERO suites show that CARE achieves 9.0–10.8× speedups while preserving at least 85.8% of reference‑solved episodes with 95% confidence, and it outperforms non‑guaranteed selectors in both budget adherence and rollout efficiency.

By Rui Liu, Tong Zheng, Jindong Gu, Zhipeng Wang