arXiv AI By Jinwoong Kim, Sangjin Park

GroupSegment-SHAP: Shapley Value Explanations with Group-Segment Players for Multivariate Time Series

Read the original on arXiv AI →

GroupSegment-SHAP (GS‑SHAP) introduces explanatory units called group‑segment players that capture cross‑variable dependence and distribution shifts over time in multivariate time‑series models. By attributing Shapley values to these units, GS‑SHAP preserves joint structural signals that traditional time‑series SHAP variants fragment. Experiments on human activity recognition, power‑system forecasting, medical signal analysis, and financial time series show that GS‑SHAP improves deletion‑based faithfulness by about 1.7× and reduces runtime by roughly 40% compared to existing baselines, while a financial case study demonstrates its ability to reveal interpretable multivariate‑temporal interactions during high‑volatility periods.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 27

TempShap: When and How Much a Feature Matters in Time-Series Forecasting

TempShap introduces a Shapley-based framework that attributes importance to individual time‑step and feature cells in a time‑series forecast, providing both temporal localization and horizon‑impact profiles. Unlike traditional Shapley explainers that treat each feature as a single player, TempShap’s cell‑level approach captures when and how much a feature matters across the forecast horizon. The method is validated through planted temporal structures, exact cell games, and a closed‑form oracle for linear forecasters, and demonstrates improved deletion‑ranking performance over existing estimators.

By Chi Zhao, Anastasiia Chelnokova, Jing Liu, Elena Parilina
arXiv AI
Oct 23

GRAIL: From Saliency to Semantics in Time-Series Explanation

GRAIL is a region‑based framework for explaining time‑series models that moves beyond per‑timestep saliency by treating domain‑specific intervals—such as the P‑wave and QRS complex in ECG data—as players in a cooperative game. It describes each region with human‑readable features, generates counterfactual baselines using an on‑manifold conditional generator, and incorporates static covariates as singleton players to directly weigh tabular evidence against the signal. The method attributes predictions via Owen values with variance reduction, and experiments on synthetic and real data demonstrate faithful, robust explanations that provide meaningful knowledge to domain experts.

By Enver Menadjiev, Yiqiu Shen, Jaesik Choi, Julia Stoyanovich
arXiv AI
Oct 9

Explanation Multiplicity in SHAP: Characterization and Assessment

The paper investigates the phenomenon of explanation multiplicity in SHAP, showing that SHAP explanations can vary significantly across repeated runs even when the model, input, and prediction remain unchanged. The authors introduce a dual‑seed evaluation protocol, a hierarchy of metrics, and null models to quantify this variability, finding that multiplicity is widespread across datasets, models, and sampling strategies. They also demonstrate that common metrics like L2 distance may underestimate instability, while rank‑based metrics reveal substantial changes in top‑ranked features, and that improved sampling methods do not fully eliminate run‑to‑run variation.

By Hyunseung Hwang, Seungeun Lee, Lucas Rosenblatt, Steven Euijong Whang, Julia Stoyanovich
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

DynSHAP: Towards Explainable Dynamic Survival Analysis

DynSHAP is a SHAP-based framework designed for dynamic survival analysis, extending marginal SHAP estimators to handle time–feature pairs as players in the Shapley game. It introduces Temporal DynSHAP, which models linear dependencies across time and uses conditional sampling to improve explanations. Experiments on synthetic data and two real-world clinical datasets show that Temporal DynSHAP more accurately recovers temporally dependent features and provides faithful attributions for two DSA architectures, enabling medical experts to identify which patient information influenced predictions and when.

By Nastasya Anokhina, Jonas J\"ur{\ss}, Pietro Li\`o