The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
arXiv:2608.30437v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph-augmented large language models often assume that graph evidence produced by external computation and placed in the input can be used by the nati...
arXiv:2602. 11745v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph models are fundamental to data analysis in domains rich with complex relationships.
arXiv:2606. 11562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph analysis underlies many applications whose answers cannot be looked up in a single record or retrieved along a path: laundering rings, drug repurposing, user preference, and scientific theme are all inferred from a node together with its neighbourhood.
The paper investigates whether natural language inference (NLI) can be performed using only interpretable, graph-based representations of evidence. It introduces a pipeline that decomposes sentences into atomic propositions, maps them to ConceptNet triples, and feeds three graphs—premise, hypothesis, and a retrieved ConceptNet subgraph—into a fine‑tuned 0.8‑billion‑parameter language model. On the SNLI dataset the graph‑only model reaches 89.7% accuracy, close to a text‑based baseline, while on ANLI it matches RoBERTa‑large on rounds R2 and R3 but lags on R1, illustrating a trade‑off between interpretability and performance.
arXiv:2606. 16603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in data-intensive analytical tasks, yet their outputs are rarely verifiable: a reliance on linear text trajectories makes their reasoning difficult to audit.
arXiv:2608. 12391v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph reasoning provides a promising testbed for evaluating the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), as graph instances can be programmatically generated, structurally controlled, and naturally scaled to long-input settings.