arXiv Computation and Language By Xinyu Liu, Dongqi Fu, Jun Wu

Diagnostic Analysis for Large Language Model Reasoning

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces a two-stage diagnostic evaluation to assess the structural reliability of reasoning graphs used in large language models for tasks like multi-hop question answering. Stage 1 examines how graph reliability depends on topology, prompt design, and model family, while Stage 2 evaluates the impact of graph errors on uncertainty estimation. Findings show that graph-based computation is vulnerable to upstream errors, offers limited benefit as prompt context alone, but improves confidence-based answer discrimination and enables node-level diagnostics.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

GUT: Quantifying and Optimizing the Reasoning Uncertainty of LLMs via Graph Complexity

The paper introduces GUT, a method that uses directed acyclic graphs to represent all possible reasoning branches of Large Language Models (LLMs). It comprises two modules: GUT-Q, which quantifies reasoning uncertainty by approximating graph complexity, and GUT-O, which reduces uncertainty through reinforcement learning that rewards lower uncertainty. Experiments on four LLMs across five datasets demonstrate GUT’s effectiveness in measuring and mitigating reasoning uncertainty.

By Shuang Liang, Xin-Yu Hu, Xiang-Jun Ou, Shao-Qun Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv:2603.16654v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) solely from final answers can obscure failures in intermediate steps, espe...

By Xiaojie Gu, Sherry T. Tong, Aosong Feng, Sophia Simeng Han, Jinghui Lu, Yingjian Chen, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Chanjun Park, Rex Ying, Irene Li