arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 25

SpectralCTGaussians: Projection-Domain Reconstruction and Basis Material Decomposition for Spectral CT using 3D Gaussian Splatting

SpectralCTGaussians introduces a novel spectral CT reconstruction and basis material decomposition technique that employs 3D Gaussian splatting with per‑Gaussian material fractions and energy‑dependent basis functions. By jointly optimizing these parameters across all energy channels via a differentiable polychromatic forward model, the method achieves superior novel view synthesis and higher PSNR for spectral CT volume reconstruction compared to traditional and learning‑based baselines. It also provides one‑step material decomposition with direct RGB segmentation and recovers the photoelectric basis more accurately than existing pipelines.

By Reinout Vos, Saptarshi Neil Sinha, Michael Weinmann
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

$K$-NeAS: Scalable Multi-Material CT Reconstruction Using Neural SDFs

The paper introduces $K$-NeAS, a scalable neural architecture for multi-material CT reconstruction that replaces separate material networks with a shared latent backbone and a differentiable $K$-material soft selector. It automates attenuation bounds using a Gaussian Mixture Model and adds a scheduled auxiliary floater loss to reduce geometric hallucinations in sparse-view settings. Evaluated on four clinical CBCT datasets, $K$-NeAS achieves higher 3D volumetric fidelity—up to a 1.88 dB PSNR gain over a single-material baseline—and shows improved robustness under extreme sparsity, outperforming baselines by up to 1.17 dB.

By Daksh K. Shah, Emmanouil Nikolakakis, Razvan Marinescu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 21

Projection-Volume Fidelity Divergence: Diagnosing and Controlling Optimization Drift in Sparse-View 3D Gaussian Tomography

Sparse-view computed tomography is a severely ill-posed inverse problem, where recent 3D Gaussian Splatting methods offer an efficient explicit representation for tomographic reconstruction. However, we find that projection-domain optimization can be misleading in this setting: the rendered projections may continue to improve while the reconstructed volume deteriorates.