arXiv AI By Mehul Parmar, Chaklam Silpasuwanchai

From Overload to Convergence: Supporting Multi-Issue Human-AI Negotiation with Bayesian Visualization

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2603. 22766v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As AI systems increasingly mediate negotiations, understanding how the number of negotiated issues impacts human performance is crucial for maintaining human agency.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) Model: A Computational Account of What Makes Design Options Worth Trying

This paper proposes the Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) model, which formalizes the value of trying a candidate design action as its expected reduction of epistemic uncertainty about action--outcome relations. The model addresses one part of the Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model's open question concerning how changes in uncertainty perception determine action selection.

arXiv AI
Jun 16

AI systems out-persuade expert humans

arXiv:2606. 16475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many societal decisions are settled by contests of persuasion.

By Kobi Hackenburg, Caroline Wagner, Luke Hewitt, Ben M. Tappin, Ed Saunders, Hannah Rose Kirk, Helen Margetts, Christopher Summerfield
arXiv AI
Aug 7

Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) Model: A Computational Account of What Makes Design Options Worth Trying

arXiv:2608. 05642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper proposes the Bayesian Expected Uncertainty Reduction (B-EUR) model, which formalizes the value of trying a candidate design action as its expected reduction of epistemic uncertainty about action--outcome relations.

By Shimon Honda, Takuma Miyaguchi, Koji Koizumi, Takanori Sano, Tristan Briard, Hideyoshi Yanagisawa