arXiv:2609.05905v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly used for live forecasting, where they retrieve up-to-date information and produce estimates for unresolved future events....
By Yuanpu Cao, Yongkang Du, Yurui Chang, Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen
arXiv:2608.23058v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) now support forecasting systems that combine language-based reasoning with temporal data, evidence retrieval, external too...
By Xiaogang Xu, Jiaqi Tang, Jianmin Chen, Yingying Yan, Zhenchao Tang, Xiangxin Zhou, Xiaobin Hu, Wei Wei, Jinfeng Wu, Qifeng Chen, Lu Zhou, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu, Jianwei Yin, Weimin Zheng
arXiv:2606. 02497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series forecasting has advanced rapidly, especially with the emergence of foundation models that show strong zero-shot performance on numerical extrapolation.
By Yuhua Liao, Zetian Wang, Qiangqiang Nie, Zhenhua Zhang
arXiv:2609.24862v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agentic time series forecasting concerns systems whose underlying mechanisms evolve, making the relative effectiveness of numerical models, reasoning s...
By Yifan Hu, Xilin Dai, Zhiyuan Qu, Yiding Liu, Zewei Dong, Jiang-ming Yang, Qiang Xu
LEAP (Likelihood Elicitation and Aggregation for Probabilistic forecasting) is a new approach that reorganizes how evidence is used in LLM-based forecasting systems. Instead of a monolithic prediction that aggregates all evidence at once, LEAP examines each evidence item separately, elicits likelihood parameters, and combines them with an explicit prior to produce a posterior distribution. The method supports continuous, single-choice, and multi-choice forecasts and has been shown to improve prediction and calibration metrics across models on a benchmark covering forecasting, information-seeking, and browsing tasks.
By Yufei Chen, Yiran Zhao, Xiaogang Xu, Qipeng Xie, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu
The paper demonstrates that deep limit order book forecasting models can be repurposed to quantify scenario-conditioned market impact without retraining. By injecting counterfactual order‑book messages into a trained Transformer forecaster, the authors compare predictive distributions before and after the injection, defining a short‑horizon model‑implied market impact. The approach achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.99 and 97.2% directional agreement with historical outcomes for non‑neutral scenarios, and captures incremental sequence‑dependent variation beyond scenario identity and pre‑event forecasts.
By Eljas Linna, Kestutis Baltakys, Derrick Manoharan, Alexandros Iosifidis, Juho Kanniainen