Timely, high-resolution maps of flood extent around settlements are essential for emergency response and damage assessment. We consider airborne RGB imagery for flood mapping as it can be collected rapidly at low cost.
arXiv:2608. 15410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning segmentation enables vision-language models (VLMs) to translate mission-relevant language requests into pixel-level visual grounding, offering a natural perception interface for embodied agents.
By Rajat Bhattacharjya, Yoomee Jung, Minwoo Kim, Sing-Yao Wu, Eli Bozorgzadeh, Nalini Venkatasubramanian, Nikil Dutt
arXiv:2505.15147v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Remote sensing images (RSIs) capture both natural and human-induced changes on the Earth's surface. Semantic segmentation (SS) of RSIs enables the...
By Quanwei Liu, Tao Huang, Jiaqi Yang, Wei Xiang
arXiv:2608. 07562v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Urban flooding poses an escalating threat to transportation infrastructure, yet no operational system provides real-time, street-level flood-depth estimates at centimeter resolution.
By Nafis Fuad, Xiaodong Qian, Dongxiao Zhu
arXiv:2606. 18661v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Intelligent landslide hazard interpretation is critical for disaster prevention, yet current paradigms struggle to simultaneously extract visual features and high-level geoscientific semantics, while general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs) suffer from perceptual limitations and domain hallucinations in complex geological scenarios.
By Chengfu Liu, Dongyang Hou, Junwu Xiang, Cheng Yang, Xuezhi Cui, Zeyuan Wang, Liangtian Liu, Zelang Miao
The paper introduces FloodVision, a knowledge-guided vision‑language framework that estimates urban flood depth from a single RGB image. It combines a general‑purpose vision‑language model with FloodKG, a domain knowledge base that encodes canonical object dimensions and component landmarks to promote component‑level reasoning. On 654 crowdsourced New York flood images, FloodVision cuts mean absolute error from 15.62 cm to 8.75 cm and median error from 14.35 cm to 7.75 cm, outperforming the VLM‑only baseline in 69.3 % of cases.
By Zhangding Liu, Neda Mohammadi, John E. Taylor