The paper introduces a latent information sharing scheme for federated learning that mitigates client drift by sharing a small amount of hidden‑layer activations. The authors demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this approach improves training efficiency while maintaining convergence guarantees and data privacy. Compared to existing methods such as FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedPVR, FedProto, and SplitFed, the proposed method achieves higher model accuracy within a fixed round budget without adding significant communication overhead.
By Seungjun Lee, Ensieh Khazaei, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Baturalp Buyukates, Sunwoo Lee
arXiv:2607. 04189v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is fundamentally challenged by statistical heterogeneity, where non-identically distributed (non-IID) data induces client drift that severely hampers global convergence.
By Liyang Yuan, Yibo Yang, Dandan Guo, Peter Richtarik, Zhouchen Lin
arXiv:2606. 14416v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) often struggles with generalization due to heterogeneous client data.
By Dongwon Kim, Donghee Kim, Sung Kuk Shyn, Kwangsu Kim
arXiv:2408. 05886v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Heterogeneous system configurations of distributed clients connected to the central server (CS) via a time-varying wireless network pose significant challenges for popular distributed machine learning (ML) algorithms such as federated learning (FL).
By Ferdous Pervej, Minseok Choi, Andreas F. Molisch
arXiv:2608. 07007v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative machine learning (ML) across distributed clients while preserving privacy.
By Majid Kundroo, Tinku Singh, Taehong Kim
arXiv:2608. 02250v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) is a popular distributed learning framework where multiple clients perform local training and a server aggregates the locally updated models.
By Yuan-Heng Tsai, Li-Hsing Yen, Yan-Wei Chen