The paper introduces a latent information sharing scheme for federated learning that mitigates client drift by sharing a small amount of hidden‑layer activations. The authors demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this approach improves training efficiency while maintaining convergence guarantees and data privacy. Compared to existing methods such as FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedPVR, FedProto, and SplitFed, the proposed method achieves higher model accuracy within a fixed round budget without adding significant communication overhead.
By Seungjun Lee, Ensieh Khazaei, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Baturalp Buyukates, Sunwoo Lee
arXiv:2508. 12042v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning (FL) allows collaborative training of machine learning models across multiple parties without sharing raw data.
By Zahra Kharaghani, Ali Dadras, Tommy L\"ofstedt
arXiv:2606. 30161v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning typically aggregates client updates using fixed or heuristic weighting rules, which can be suboptimal when clients have heterogeneous data and varying contributions to the global model.
By Dario Fenoglio, Daniil Kirilenko, Martin Gjoreski, Marc Langheinrich
arXiv:2608. 14654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative paradigm that enables multiple devices to train a global model while preserving local data privacy.
By Hai Anh Tran, Cuong Ta, Truong X. Tran
arXiv:2607. 04170v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized training without data sharing, but suffers from statistical heterogeneity across clients, leading to client drift, poor generalization, and sharp minima compared to centralized training.
By Liyang Yuan, Yibo Yang, Dandan Guo
arXiv:2608. 07007v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative machine learning (ML) across distributed clients while preserving privacy.
By Majid Kundroo, Tinku Singh, Taehong Kim